News & Analysis as of

Royalties Franchisors

Lathrop GPM

Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Certain Franchisee Claims Against Franchisor Due to Release of Liability and...

Lathrop GPM on

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of certain claims by franchisees Red Fit, LLC and Cali Red, LLC against franchisor Red Effect International Franchise, LLC based on a release of...more

Lathrop GPM

Illinois Federal Court Denies Cross Motions for Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract and Guaranty Claims Due to Ambiguity in the...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Illinois recently denied cross motions for partial summary judgment as to franchisor 360 Painting, LLC’s claims for breach of contract by painting franchisee R. Sterling Enterprises, Inc. (RSE), and breach...more

Lathrop GPM

California Court of Appeals Affirms Rejection of Reverse Royalty Damages in a Breach of Contract Action by Franchisee

Lathrop GPM on

An appellate court in California has affirmed a trial court’s rejection of more than $4 million in lost business profits, which appellant Glen Suh alleged in a breach of contract action against franchisor Boba Time, Inc. Suh...more

Lathrop GPM

New York Appellate Court Dismisses Royalties Claim Because of Franchisor’s Breach Under Preliminary Injunction

Lathrop GPM on

A state appellate court in New York recently held a franchisor was not entitled to unpaid royalty fees because of its own breach of a franchise agreement reinstated by preliminary injunction. Integrity Real Estate Consultants...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Tax on Renewals

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Virginia denied tax franchisor, Liberty Tax’s, motion to dismiss complaints by two of its area developers (“ADs”). The ADs claimed Liberty Tax breached their contract for wrongfully terminating, failing to...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #271

Lathrop GPM on

Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Action Settlement Approval and Fee Award - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed the approval of a $10 million voucher settlement and a $2.6 million attorneys’ fee award in a class...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Defaults Sink Bathroom Remodel Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

On competing motions for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) by ReBath – a nationwide bathroom remodeling franchisor, and its terminated franchisee, ReBath prevailed in restraining the ex-franchisee’s further operations. A...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Your Neighborhood Debtor

Lewitt Hackman on

A bankruptcy court has found that Applebee’s failed to properly terminate its franchise agreements prior to the franchisee petitioning for bankruptcy. Therefore, the franchise agreements remained in effect and were property...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Franchisor Fails to Escape State’s Changed Tax Interpretation

Lewitt Hackman on

A state appellate court (“Court”) in New Mexico upheld a decision by the state’s Taxation and Revenue Department (“Department”) that royalties paid to out-of-state franchisors are subject to the state’s gross receipts tax...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Cannabiz Accounting

Lewitt Hackman on

Tax service franchisor, H&R Block, was recently vindicated in having terminated a franchisee for violating an in-term non-compete covenant. A United States District Court granted the franchisor summary judgment in Devore v....more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Supreme Tax Implications

Lewitt Hackman on

On June 21 the U.S. Supreme Court reversed prior case law and let states tax online retailers that do not have physical presence in the state. The ruling also has significant implications for franchise systems that sell...more

Lewitt Hackman

Why Yesterday's SCOTUS Decision May Impact Franchisor Royalties

Lewitt Hackman on

Yesterday, in South Dakota vs. WayFair, Inc., et al., the United States Supreme Court (“Court”) overturned long-standing precedents that required an out-of-state Seller to have a physical presence in a state to collect...more

Jones Day

Patently Abusive Chapter 11 Cases Filed by Non-Financially Distressed Companies Dismissed for Bad Faith

Jones Day on

In the service of the Bankruptcy Code’s goals of giving debtors a "fresh start" and ensuring that estate assets are fairly and equally distributed among similarly situated creditors, the Bankruptcy Code contains an array of...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Pizza Franchisor Gets Burnt

Lewitt Hackman on

A recent case from Indiana demonstrates consequences to a franchisor that deviates from the contractually agreed audit method. In Noble Roman's Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distributing Co., an Indiana federal court granted a pizza...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Future Royalties and Beyond

Lewitt Hackman on

A Florida federal court refused to dismiss a franchisor's claim for past due royalties and lost future profits. The case concerned an Interim Healthcare staffing franchise in Arizona. The franchisor issued a default notice...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Franchisor Bankruptcy Case Dismissed as a Bad Faith Filing

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware recently issued an opinion discussing the tension between using bankruptcy as a legitimate tool to maximize value versus using bankruptcy merely as a litigation...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: What to Do About Franchisor’s Harmful New Policies

Lewitt Hackman on

Franchisees aren't always excited when their franchisor introduces a new policy. But if a new policy overreaches and might doom a franchisee's business, can it be stopped before it starts?...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide