News & Analysis as of

Rule 10b-5 Corporations Code

Allen Matkins

Bharara Task Force Overlooks California Insider Trading Statute

Allen Matkins on

I have long advocated for a federal statutory definition of insider trading because I believe that the current approach has been for the courts to convict first and then explicate the theory supporting the conviction in a...more

Allen Matkins

Woodbridge Trustee Seeks Relief In California's Corporate Securities Law

Allen Matkins on

On Monday, the trustee of the Woodbridge Liquidation Trust filed a lawsuit against numerous law firms and lawyers. The trustee's lawsuit relates to the reportedly $1.3 billion Ponzi scheme allegedly orchestrated by Robert H....more

Allen Matkins

Is There Securities Fraud Without Reliance And Causation?

Allen Matkins on

Section 25401 of the Corporations Code is California's securities fraud statute. Readers of this space will know that that scienter was not required under the former version of the statute but that the legislature rewrote...more

Allen Matkins

Are Company Misstatements Of Diversity Actionable Under Rule 10b-5?

Allen Matkins on

In a typical securities fraud action brought under Rule 10b-5, a private plaintiff must prove (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or...more

Allen Matkins

Court Rules No Scienter Required

Allen Matkins on

Both Corporations Code Section 25401 and Rule 10b-5 concern securities fraud. Section 25401, however, was modeled on Section 12(2) (now 12(a)(2)) of the Securities Act of 1933 while Section 10b-5 was adopted under Section...more

Allen Matkins

Section 25401 – Does No One Know Its History?

Allen Matkins on

A few years back, I criticized the amendment of California Corporations Code Section 25401 to conform to Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. See California Creates Complete Chaos By Rewriting Anti-Fraud...more

Allen Matkins

California Reverts To Former Securities Anti-Fraud Statute

Allen Matkins on

Readers of this blog will recall my chariness of a 2013 amendment to California’s basic securities anti-fraud statute.  See California Creates Complete Chaos By Rewriting Anti-Fraud Statute, But “We Are Against Fraud Aren’t...more

Allen Matkins

When California Copied Rule 10b-5 Did It Shut The State Courthouse Door To Securities Fraud Suits?

Allen Matkins on

Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides: “The district courts of the United States . . . shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of [the Exchange Act] or the rules and regulations thereunder,...more

Allen Matkins

This Ruling Appears To “Unravel The Very Fabric Of The Space-time Continuum”

Allen Matkins on

In prior posts, I’ve cast a jaundiced eye on last year’s amendment of California’s general securities fraud statute, Corporations Code Section 25401. See Die Verwandlung: How The Legislature Likely Raised The Bar On...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide