News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Case Consolidation

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Saiber LLC

The NetChoice Social Media Cases: Back to the Beginning

Saiber LLC on

​​​​​​​In a past Trending Law Blog post on November 1, 2023, we discussed how the Supreme Court of the United States granted petitions for certiorari in Florida’s NetChoice LLC v. Moody case and Texas’ NetChoice LLC v. Paxton...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 27, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions today: Moyle v. United States; Idaho v. United States, Nos. 23-726, 23-727: After granting certioriari to decide whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and...more

Harris Beach PLLC

National Mass Torts: 2023 Year in Review

Harris Beach PLLC on

Sixth Circuit Rejects Overly Ambitious PFAS Class Action - Hardwick v. 3M Co. (In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours), No. 22-3765, 87 F.4th 315 (6th Cir. Nov. 27, 2023) - The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - January 8, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On January 5, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in three cases: Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719: This case addresses the Colorado Supreme Court’s December ruling that barred Donald Trump from...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 15, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in two cases: Carnahan v. Maloney, No. 22-425: This is an Article III standing case arising from the federal statute, 5 U.S.C. § 2954, that directs...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

SCOTUS Signals Likely Reversal in SuperValu, Arguments Reflect Concerns over Application to Other FCA Cases

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On April 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in two consolidated cases that have the potential to upend False Claims Act (FCA) litigation. Oral argument on both sides and questioning from the...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

Mind Games: SCOTUS to Rule on what “Knowing” Means under the False Claims Act

What does it mean to “knowingly” or “recklessly” violate the law when that law consists of highly complex and ever-changing regulations, which may be open to interpretation? The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review...more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court To Decide Significant Case on False Claims Act's Scienter Standard

WilmerHale on

On January 13, 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in a pair of consolidated cases from the Seventh Circuit that could result in one of the most consequential False Claims Act (FCA) decisions since the FCA was amended...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Spotlight on Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

Robinson & Cole LLP on

Nearly forty-five years after its decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Supreme Court appears poised to overturn or significantly depart from its prior approval of the use of race as a “plus...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on OSHA’s COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard and CMS Vaccine Rule

On Friday, January 7, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments on challenges to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Supreme Court to Hear Consolidated Appeals on Vaccine Mandates on January 7, 2022

CDF Labor Law LLP on

While the Supreme Court declined to stay the implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Agency’s vaccine mandate for employers with 100+ employees or to change the status of the rule issued by the Centers for...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Review of FTC Monetary Relief Authority Threatens Long-Standing Agency Practice

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, that could substantially curtail the primary authority the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) relies on to seek monetary...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Supreme Court Vacates its Prior Grant of the FTC’s Petition for Certiorari in FTC v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC: What Does it Mean...

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on

This morning, in a brief line order, the Supreme Court vacated its prior grant of the Federal Trade Commission’s petition for certiorari in Federal Trade Commission v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC (“Credit Bureau”). Justice...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court to Review FTC’s Right to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief

Morgan Lewis on

For decades, the Federal Trade Commission has invoked Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act to file suit in federal court in pursuit of both injunctive relief and equitable monetary relief....more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal on ACA’s Constitutionality

King & Spalding on

On March 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari to hear appeals in two cases concerning the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA): California, et al. v. Texas, et al., Case No. 19-840...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Takes Up 5th Circuit Challenge to Affordable Care Act

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On Monday, March 2, 2020, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Texas v. California and California v. Texas, both of which address the Fifth Circuit’s decision to strike down the...more

Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC

Consolidated Cases Retain Right to Appeal

In a decision made by the Supreme Court in the Fall of 2017, justices announced independent cause for appeal by a party in consolidated cases cannot be denied. This was decided during a dispute between a brother and sister...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Consolidation, Like Marriage, Preserves the Distinct Identities and Rights of Its Constituents

In its recent decision in Hall vs. Hall, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that after a final decision in one of several consolidated cases, the losing party has the immediate right to appeal that decision, even when...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

SCOTUS Holds that Cases Consolidated Under FRCP 42(a) Are Independent for Purposes of Finality and Appealability

Robins Kaplan LLP on

On March 27, 2018, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Hall v. Hall, Case No. 16-1150, holding that cases consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) remain independent for purposes of determining...more

Carlton Fields

Together, But Independent – Finality Under Rule 42(a) Consolidation

Carlton Fields on

The United States Supreme Court recently clarified that cases consolidated under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure retain their independent identities “at least to the extent that a final decision in one is...more

Genova Burns LLC

Supreme Court Clarifies Appeal Timing for Consolidated Cases

Genova Burns LLC on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that when a final decision has been issued in one of several consolidated civil cases, the losing party can immediately appeal, even if other of the consolidated cases are ongoing. Hall v....more

A&O Shearman

United States Supreme Court Allows For Appeals From Final Decisions Regarding Individual Actions In Ongoing Consolidated...

A&O Shearman on

On Tuesday, March 27, 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts announced a unanimous decision of the United States Supreme Court that allows immediate appeals from final decisions issued in any action that has been consolidated with...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

SCOTUS Raises an Interesting Question for Appeals in Consolidated Cases in Wisconsin

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court today decided unanimously that, when cases are consolidated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), they nevertheless remain separate cases. In Hall v. Hall, No. 16-1150, two separate cases had been consolidated...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Potential Impact on Alabama If U.S. Supreme Court Approves South Dakota Economic Nexus Statute

To the surprise of many, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the State of South Dakota’s petition for writ of certiorari in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. et al., No. 17-494, on January 12. The case involves the constitutionality...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Sends Challenges to Clean Water Rule to Federal District Courts

Perkins Coie on

In a unanimous decision on January 22, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that challenges to the Obama administration’s 2015 Clean Water Rule must be brought in federal district courts rather than directly in the courts of appeals....more

46 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide