News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Medicare Healthcare

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

The Overturn of Chevron: A New Design for Healthcare Law

On June 28, 2024, SCOTUS overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine in its decision Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce. The Court’s ruling will have a significant impact on...more

ArentFox Schiff

Post-Chevron Health Care Regulations: The Dawn of a New Day

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 28, the US Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine — the legal principle that the judiciary should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. Chevron reflected the view...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Healthcare Providers Could Finally Have Their Day in Court: Supreme Court Holds That Defendants Are Entitled to Jury Trials When...

On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy, a case involving a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) enforcement action for civil penalties against an investment...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron in Landmark Decision with Broad Implications for Medicare Reimbursement Litigation

King & Spalding on

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo that overturned the Chevron Doctrine, which requires courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, thereby...more

Lippes Mathias LLP

Supreme Court Decides in Favor of Tribal Nations in Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe

Lippes Mathias LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 6 decision is a victory for Tribal Nations, affording them new opportunities to recover contract support costs pertaining to healthcare programs. In Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, the...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Ruling Supports Tribal Healthcare Funding and Self-Determination

Snell & Wilmer on

By Heidi McNeil Staudenmaier and Kelsey Haake  In a momentous decision on June 6, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a resounding victory for Native American tribes. The Court ruled that the Indian Health Service (IHS)...more

King & Spalding

CMS Issues Ruling 1498-R3 Revoking 1498-R2 Regarding Disproportionate Share Medicare/SSI Fractions

King & Spalding on

On March 4, 2024, CMS issued Ruling 1498-R3 which revokes CMS Ruling 1498-R2. CMS Ruling 1498-R2 gave providers the option of using either “total” days or “covered” days in calculating their disproportionate share (DSH)...more

Paul Hastings LLP

SuperValu and Executive Health Resources: What to Know About the FCA Following the 2023 Term

Paul Hastings LLP on

As we take stock of the Supreme Court’s 2023 term, two landmark decisions shift our understanding of scienter and government intervention as it relates to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. First, on June 1,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court’s SuperValu Decision: a Game-Changer for Assessing FCA Violations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in False Claims Act cases. In United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., it unanimously held that liability under the False Claims Act depends...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

Supreme Court Removes Some Defenses to False Claims Act Liability for Government Contractors and Health Care Providers

Government contractors, health care providers and many other parties who submit claims for payment to the federal government are subject to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA). This month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Supreme Court Again Tightens FCA Intent, But Tricky Questions Linger

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Supreme Court brushed aside novel assertions from two pharmacy retailers on June 1 and ruled unanimously that False Claims Act liability hinges on whether defendants subjectively believed their claims were “false.” In...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Schutte-Proctor Aftermath: Tips for the Health Care Industry

In one of the most closely watched False Claims Act (FCA) cases in years, the Supreme Court unanimously decided on June 1 that when determining intent under the statute, courts must consider the state of mind of the defendant...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

United States Supreme Court: Look to Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs to Decide Whether It “Knowingly” Submitted False Claim

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., clarifying when a defendant “knowingly” submits a false claim for payment under the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court...more

Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto LLP

The Government’s Ability to Combat Fraud is on the Line in False Claims Act Supreme Court Case

Oral arguments are scheduled for April 18, 2023, in the Supreme Court case combining two Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals cases U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc. (“SuperValu”) and U.S. ex rel. Thomas Proctor v. Safeway,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

False Claims Act: Prediction on Supreme Court Ruling on Government Dismissal Authority

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On December 6, 2022, the Supreme Court heard argument in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., a case with potential implications on the cost and longevity of certain False Claims Act (FCA)...more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

340B Update: District Court Rejects 2022 Payment Methodology for 340B Hospitals Following Supreme Court Win

We follow up on our previous blog post concerning the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favor of 340B hospitals. The Supreme Court previously held that “absent a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS may not vary...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

Supreme Court Decision Maintains Status Quo for Disproportionate Share Percentage Calculation: What Does It Mean for the 340B...

Quarles & Brady LLP on

Last week, the Supreme Court released a decision relating to how the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requires hospitals to calculate its disproportionate share percentage. While this percentage is primarily used...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court To Decide Standard For Government Dismissal Of False Claims Act Cases

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case that will decide two important questions under the False Claims Act (FCA).  In United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the Relator asks the Court to...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Supreme Court Strikes Down Medicare Part B Reimbursement Reduction for 340B Drugs

The Supreme Court yesterday issued a unanimous opinion striking down the federal government’s reduction in Medicare Part B reimbursement for 340B drugs for calendar years 2018 and 2019. As background, the Centers for Medicare...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Sides with 340B Hospitals in Significant $1.6 Billion Part B Drug Payment Ruling

Quarles & Brady LLP on

On June 15, 2022, after many years of ongoing litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned a substantial Medicare Part B payment reduction to many 340B Program participating hospitals related to certain...more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

Supreme Court Decides in Favor of 340B Hospitals Regarding Medicare Reimbursement Methodology

On June 15, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of “340B” hospitals in a notable statutory interpretation case concerning how the federal Medicare program reimburses hospitals for prescription drugs. The...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Ten Individuals Charged for $1.4 Billion Health Care Billing Scheme

ArentFox Schiff on

Ten Individuals Charged for $1.4 Billion Health Care Billing Schemem - On June 29, an indictment was unsealed charging ten individuals with health care fraud and wire fraud for allegedly participating in a pass-through...more

Troutman Pepper

US Supreme Court False Claims Act Decision in Escobar Has Significant Implications for Contractors

Troutman Pepper on

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the matter of Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016), changing the legal landscape for False Claims Act qui tam claims...more

42 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide