Sham Litigation Exception

News & Analysis as of

A Useful Reminder About Sham Litigation as Exclusionary Conduct

In Surface Supplied, Inc. v. Kirby Morgan Dive Systems, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143478 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2013) (Chesney, J.), the Court dismissed attempted monopolization and monopolization counterclaims with leave to...more

Court Finds Sham Litigation Violates Secondary Boycott Provisions of NLRA, But NLRA Prohibitions Do Not Apply to Worker Centers

On August 26, 2013, in Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. UFCW (4th Cir. 2013), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit delivered a victory, in part, to employers and, in part, to labor. In its decision, the Fourth Circuit...more

"Sham Litigation" Suit Revived by Fourth Circuit

Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 27 - No. 12-1429, 2013 WL 4505288 (4th Cir. Aug. 26, 2013) - In Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 27, the...more

General Liability Policies May Cover Antitrust, Patent and Other Business Litigation - Part 2

In a prior post, we explained how a general liability policy may cover antitrust, patent, trade secret and other business litigation claims, if there are allegations that insured made negative comments about the other party’s...more

“Sham Litigation” Claim Can Be Decided On The Pleadings

In a recent decision, the North Carolina Business Court in Lorillard Tobacco Company v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 2011 NCBC 30 (August 8, 2011) (“Lorillard”) has found that an unfair trade practice counterclaim, based on...more

5 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1