News & Analysis as of

Stanford University Patent Trial and Appeal Board

ArentFox Schiff

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB Decisions Holding Computer-Based Diagnostic Method Claims Ineligible

ArentFox Schiff on

Decision highlights the need for applicants to focus on additional improvements to technology when drafting and prosecuting applications directed to computer-implemented diagnostics methods. On March 25, 2021, the Federal...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Federal Circuit Holds Stanford’s Genetics Method Claims Abstract Under Section 101

On March 25, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in In re Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ., No. 2020-1288 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 25, 2021), affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s rejection of the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Remand Where PTAB Decision Does Not Explain Reasoning, Account for All Evidence

In reviewing a decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) deciding three interferences involving competing claims directed to testing methods for fetal aneuploidies, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit...more

Troutman Pepper

Stanford Patent Found Invalid in IPR proceedings but Licensee’s IP Survives

Troutman Pepper on

In a decision this month (IPR2013-00308), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has ruled against Stanford University’s patented method for detecting Down’s syndrome and other chromosomal defects, finding all of the...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide