News & Analysis as of

Subject Matter Jurisdiction › Pesticides

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.

District Court Declines to Rule on Jurisdictional Issues in Neonicotinoid Case until Summary Judgment

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. on

In two recent orders issued in the neonicotinoid seed treatment case Anderson v. McCarthy, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California declined to take immediate action in response to a motion by the U.S....more

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.

Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Dismissal in Environmental Justice Case Seeking Judicial Review of EPA’s Decision to Settle...

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. on

On May 11, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished memorandum decision in an environmental justice case, Garcia v. McCarthy, Case No. 14-15494, that many have been watching closely. The...more

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.

EPA Requests Dismissal of Complaint For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. on

On March 10, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and a supporting memorandum of law (Memorandum) in Anderson v. McCarthy, Case No....more

Nossaman LLP

Court Allows ESA Claims Involving Oversight of Pesticides to Move Forward

Nossaman LLP on

In Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 11-cv-00293-JCS, plaintiffs alleged that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act by failing to...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide