News & Analysis as of

United States Patent and Trademark Office › Supreme Court of the United States › Mayo v. Prometheus

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.... more +
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves a fundamental role in the U.S. intellectual property system by issuing patents and registering trademarks.    less -
Weintraub Tobin

USPTO Requests Input On Patent Eligibility From Critical Sectors Impacted By Current Law

Weintraub Tobin on

In recent years, the Supreme Court has decided a number of cases, including Bilski v. Kappos, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad, and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Three Properties of Patent-Eligibility: An Empirical Study

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Patent eligibility is a bit of a mess these days.  Ever since the Supreme Court handed down the Alice v. CLS Bank decision six years ago, the distinction between what might be subject matter that can be patented and what is...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Detecting Disease Is Not a “Tangible and Useful Result” Eligible for Patenting

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

The federal appeals court with jurisdiction over questions of patent law has consistently held that methods of diagnosing a disease or other biological condition violate the Supreme Court’s ban on patenting “natural...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New USPTO Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Seeks to Standardize Abstract Idea Analysis

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Mayo v. Prometheus and Alice Corp v. CLS Bank created a three-part test for determining subject matter eligibility of patent claims under 35 U.S.C. §101 that has unfortunately led to...more

Knobbe Martens

USPTO Revises Examination Procedure after Berkheimer

Knobbe Martens on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued new guidance to patent examiners in light of the Federal Circuit’s recent holdings in Berkheimer v. HP Inc., 881 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2018) and Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2018)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The tortured path that the Federal Circuit has taken (a path also trodden by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the district courts) of applying the patent eligibility decisions under Mayo Collaborative Services v....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New Year's Resolutions For The U.S. Patent System

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It’s that time of year when we make resolutions to improve our health, our relationships, our careers, or other areas of our lives. I’m not starting a new diet today (although if I were, the invention described in this patent...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

PTAB Puts Method Of Treatment Patents Under The 101 Knife

Foley & Lardner LLP on

While the Supreme Court decisions in Myriad and Mayo have been applied to diagnostic-type claims, method of treatment patents were thought to be safe from the recent judicial expansion of the patent-(in)eligibility doctrine....more

Fenwick & West LLP

USPTO's Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Roundtable on Dec. 5, 2015

Fenwick & West LLP on

On December 5, 2016 the USPTO will hold its second Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Roundtable to discuss issues in patent eligibility. The USPTO published a list of eighteen questions in anticipation of the event, dealing...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will The Celsis Appeal Put An End To 101 Rejections Of Laboratory Method Claims?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On April 5, 2016, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Rapid Litigation Mgmt. Ltd. v. CellzDirect Inc., where the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid claims directed to a “method of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Vehicle Intelligence v. Mercedes-Benz: Ineligibility as a Proxy for Lack of Enablement

Fenwick & West LLP on

The Federal Circuit has issued six decisions since December 1, 2015, all of course invalidating the patents in suit, four per curiam (Clear With Computers v. Altec Indus; Cloud Satchel v. Amazon.com; Wireless Media...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Top Five Stories of 2015

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

After reflecting upon the events of the past twelve months, Patent Docs presents its ninth annual list of top patent stories. For 2015, we identified twenty stories that were covered on Patent Docs last year that we believe...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Top Stories of 2015: #16 to #20

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

After reflecting upon the events of the past twelve months, Patent Docs presents its ninth annual list of top patent stories. For 2015, we identified twenty stories that were covered on Patent Docs last year that we believe...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Important Development in Patent Subject Matter Eligibility for Diagnostic Method Claims: Federal Circuit Denies Sequenom Petition...

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On December 2, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an order denying a petition for rehearing en banc in the closely watched Sequenom case. Earlier this year, on appeal from the U.S. District Court...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Comments on the USPTO's Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance -- The ABA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On July 30, 2015, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office updated its subject matter eligibility guidance ("July Update"). The update provided recommendations and resources for examiners in addition to those in the Office's...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Overview of Comments on the USPTO's July 2015 Update to the Interim Examination Guidance

Fenwick & West LLP on

In late July, the USPTO issued its July 2015 Update to the 2014 Interim Section 101 Patent Eligibility Guidance (IEG). The July 2015 Update addresses a number of the issues and concerns raised in the public comments to the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Australia High Court Rules Against Gene Patents

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Colleagues in Australia have been spreading the bad news: The High Court of Australia followed the lead (?) of the U.S. Supreme Court and determined that Myriad cannot patent the isolated BRCA1 gene in Australia. Thanks to...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

PTO Releases Report on Confirmatory Genetic Diagnostic Testing

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

More than three years after the June 15, 2012 deadline for providing it, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued its report on so-called "second opinion" genetic diagnostic testing, mandated by Section 27 of the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: NYIPLA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Guest Post -- On Ariosa and Natural Products

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Recently, I had the privilege of speaking at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pharmacognosy in Colorado. Members of this scientific association are dedicated to identifying and isolating natural products from...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Paul Gilbert Cole

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Patent Subject Matter Eligibility – Impact on Litigation and Prosecution

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Personalized medicine relies on diagnostic technologies to accurately evaluate a patient’s clinical or genetic signature to guide treatment decisions. Protecting innovation by patenting the diagnostic methods and tools that...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: BIO and PhRMA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: IPO

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

One Year After Alice

Burns & Levinson LLP on

It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. Pty, Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014). Although a number of software patents have been invalidated for reciting...more

56 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide