News & Analysis as of

Wages › Class Action › Piece-Rate Pay

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

Further Down the Rabbit-Hole we go: California’s Troubling Treatment of Incentive-Based Compensation Systems

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation on

On July 17, 2013, the California Supreme Court denied review of the Second Appellate District’s decision in Gonzalez v. Downtown LA Motors, 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 257 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Mar. 6, 2013), which addressed...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

California Piece-Rate Employees Entitled To Compensation For Each Hour Worked

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

Gonzalez v. Downtown LA Motors, No. B235292 (April 2, 2013): A California Court of Appeal recently held that automobile service technicians who were paid on a “piece-rate” basis should have been paid their minimum hourly wage...more

Fisher Phillips

Appellate Court Invalidates Auto Dealership's Method Of Paying Service Technicians

Fisher Phillips on

In an unpublished decision, the California 2nd District Court of Appeal held that that piece-rate-paid employees are entitled to separate hourly pay for “waiting” time. The case involved a class of 108 automobile service...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide