Latest Posts › TCPA

Share:

FCC Rules Ringless Voicemails Require Consent

On November 21, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a Declaratory Ruling and Order finding that companies must obtain consent before sending a “ringless voicemail” to a consumer’s phone because it constitutes a...more

11/23/2022  /  ATDS , FCC , Robocalling , TCPA , Telecommunications , Voicemail

Ninth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Lawsuit Challenging Unwanted Business Texts Holding TCPA Protection Extends to Business...

On October 12, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision, reversing the dismissal of a lawsuit on the grounds that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) does not extend to unwanted business texts. In Chennette v. Porch.com,...more

TCPA: Text Messages Still Hot-Button Issue After Furniture Companies Resolve Class for Millions

On July 6, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted final approval of a multimillion-dollar, class-action settlement in Parker v. Stoneledge Furniture, LLC, et al., No. 21-740 (M.D. Fla.) to resolve...more

California Dealership Resolves Telemarketing Prerecorded Message TCPA Class for $2.5M

In late June 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California gave final approval for a $2.5 million class-action settlement in Johnson v. Moss Brothers Auto Group to resolve claims brought against a motor...more

TCPA: Ninth Circuit Rejects Duguid's "Footnote Seven" Argument, Holding That Storage of a Pre-Produced List Does Not Turn a System...

In a succinct, emphatic opinion issued on January 19, the Ninth Circuit quietly rejected one of the last remaining arguments made by plaintiffs attempting to neutralize the Supreme Court’s decisive Facebook opinion...more

Where the Buck Stops in TCPA Suits: Not With the Company, But With Controlling Director, Says Court

Companies are not the only ones with exposure in consumer protection suits, as a defendant company’s director was reminded earlier this month in Zoppi v. Proform Trading LLC, No. 2:21-cv-2307 (D.N.J. Dec. 9, 2021). There, the...more

Life After Facebook: District of South Carolina Holds Predictive Dialer Is Not an ATDS

In one of the first major decisions after the Supreme Court’s Facebook v. Duguid decision, a federal district court in South Carolina (the “Court”) has ruled that the Aspect predictive dialer is not an automatic telephone...more

Man Bites Dog: DirecTV Defeats TCPA Class Action

A federal judge granted summary judgment on February 12 to DirecTV, LLC (DirecTV), holding it was not liable under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for unsolicited telemarketing calls placed by a third-party...more

3/4/2021  /  DirectTV , TCPA , Telemarketing

2020 Consumer Financial Services Year in Review & A Look Ahead

2020 was a transformative year for the consumer financial services world. As we navigate an unprecedented volume of industry regulation, Troutman Pepper is uniquely positioned to help its clients find successful resolutions...more

District Court Relies on “Capacity” Issue in Denying Debt Collector Summary Judgment Under TCPA

On December 18, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana denied a debt collector’s motion for summary judgment, suggesting that an open question of whether a telephone system had the capacity to...more

Supreme Court Answers the Call on the Definition of an Autodialer

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Duguid v. Facebook to decide, once and for all, whether an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS), as defined in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), requires a...more

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Facebook on Tuesday: What to Watch For

On Tuesday, December 8, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Duguid v. Facebook case to decide, once and for all, whether an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”), as defined in the Telephone Consumer...more

Northern District of California Denies Arbitration in TCPA Class Action, Citing Lack of Affirmative Assent to Arbitrate in Web...

On September 1, 2020, a district court in the Northern District of California weighed in on an issue of recurring importance in internet commerce: how does a business obtain a remote consumer’s effective agreement to terms...more

Breaking: Supreme Court to Weigh in on TCPA’s Autodialer Definition

On July 9th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Duguid v. Facebook to decide, once and for all, whether an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS), as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defines the phrase,...more

Winnowed TCPA Survives Constitutional Challenge Before U.S. Supreme Court

The United States Supreme Court issued its much-awaited decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants on Monday, July 6, striking down the government-backed debt exemption in the Telephone Consumer...more

FCC Issues Order Confirming that Manual Dialing Means a System is not an ATDS; Wades Into the Random or Sequential Debate

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a noteworthy order on June 25, 2020, in its continuing interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In its order, the FCC confirmed many courts’ existing...more

41 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide