Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

[Webinar] Cross-border IP strategies for IP owners and litigators - September 18th, 2:00 pm PDT

Explore skinny labelling & obviousness in Canada and Australia - If you are an intellectual property (IP) owner, a litigator or an in-house legal professional managing IP litigation in multiple jurisdictions, don’t miss...more

[Webinar] Cross-border IP strategies for IP owners and litigators - September 12th, 12:00 pm GMT

Explore skinny labelling & obviousness in Canada and Australia - If you are an intellectual property (IP) owner, a litigator or an in-house legal professional managing IP litigation in multiple jurisdictions, don’t miss...more

Dexlansoprazole formulation patent invalid and not infringed by Apotex

On February 7, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed Takeda’s action under subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations in relation to dexlansoprazole (Takeda’s DEXILANT). Justice Furlanetto...more

Federal Court of Appeal affirms Minister of Health reasonable in concluding successor second person was entitled to benefit of NOA...

On May 26, 2023, the Minister of Health determined that Biosimilar Collaborations Ireland Limited was entitled to the benefit of section 5 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), including...more

Apotex’s section 8 claim for Apo-Atomoxetine dismissed

On March 30, 2023, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Apotex’s claim under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations) relating to Apo-Atomoxetine (Lilly’s...more

Supreme Court of Canada denies Apotex leave to appeal ONCA olanzapine Statutes of Monopolies decision

As we previously reported, the Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s decision dismissing Apotex’s claims against Eli Lilly under the Ontario and English Statutes of Monopolies, Trademarks Act, and common law...more

Federal Court dismisses motion to adjourn section 8 trial to complete document production from non-party generics

As previously reported, the Federal Court found Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (422 patent)—which relates to treatment of prostate cancer in humans by co-administration of abiraterone acetate (Janssen’s ZYTIGA) and...more

Federal Court concludes Minister of Health’s decision not to reassess data protection for SPRAVATO in view of CUSMA is reasonable

Before approving Janssen’s esketamine hydrochloride product (SPRAVATO) on May 20, 2020, the Minister of Health determined that it was not an “innovative drug” as defined by section C.08.004.1(1) of the Food and Drug...more

Federal Court rejects pre-trial determination of a question of law about the nature of the section 8 but-for world

As previously reported, the Federal Court found Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (422 patent) – which relates to treatment of prostate cancer in humans by co-administration of abiraterone acetate (Janssen’s ZYTIGA) and...more

Federal Court rejects trial of common issues and allows pleadings amendment re: supply disruptions in abiraterone acetate amended...

As previously reported, the Federal Court found Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (“422 patent”) – which relates to treatment of prostate cancer in humans by co-administration of abiraterone acetate (marketed by Janssen...more

Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of Apotex’s Statutes of Monopolies and Trademarks Act claims regarding olanzapine

On March 8, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Apotex’s claims against Eli Lilly (Lilly) under the Statute of Monopolies, Trademarks Act, and common law conspiracy relating to Canadian Patent No. 2,041,113...more

Certificate of Supplementary Protection filing fee increase effective April 1, 2022

On April 1, 2022, the fee for filing a Certificate of Supplementary Protection (CSP) will increase from $9,756 to $9,952 in accordance with subsection 9(1) of the Certificate of Supplementary Protection Regulations (Canada...more

Federal Court remits BELSOMRA CSP timing refusal for redetermination

On August 9, 2019, the Minister of Health denied Merck’s application for a Certificate of Supplementary Protection (CSP) for Canadian Patent No 2,670,892 relating to the drug suvorexant (Merck’s BELSOMRA). On September 29,...more

Federal Court stays re-examination of glatiramer acetate patent pending appeal in PMNOC proceeding

On April 26, 2021, the Federal Court granted Teva’s motion for a stay of the re-examination proceeding commenced by Pharmascience in respect of Canadian Patent No. 2,760,802 (802 patent) relating to glatiramer acetate (Teva’s...more

Ontario Superior Court dismisses Apotex’s Statutes of Monopolies and Trademarks Act claims regarding olanzapine

Update: Apotex has appealed. On March 8, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted Eli Lilly’s (Lilly) motion for summary judgment and dismissed Apotex’s claims under the Statutes of Monopolies, Trademarks Act, and...more

Federal Court finds silodosin formulation patent valid but not infringed

On December 24, 2020, the Federal Court issued a decision in a patent infringement action pursuant to s. 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to silodosin (Allergan’s RAPAFLO): Allergan...more

Certificates of Supplementary Protection filing fee increase effective April 1, 2021

On April 1, 2021, the fee for filing a Certificate of Supplementary Protection (CSP) will increase from $9,564 to $9,756 in accordance with subsection 9(1) of the Certificate of Supplementary Protection Regulations...more

Millennium and Janssen seek leave from Supreme Court of Canada in section 8 bortezomib case

As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Janssen’s appeal from a decision granting Teva’s claim for compensation under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of...more

Federal Court of Appeal confirms obviousness finding in section 8 bortezomib action against Teva

As previously reported, the Federal Court granted Teva’s claim for compensation under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to Teva’s bortezomib product (Janssen markets bortezomib as...more

Rx IP Update - July 2019

Federal Court of Appeal requires PMPRB to re-determine whether patent ‘pertains to’ Galderma’s DIFFERIN - On June 28, 2019, the Federal Court of Appeal granted the appeal of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB...more

Rx IP Update - May 2019

IN THIS ISSUE: - Federal Court dismisses Servier's application for order of prohibition regarding salt patent for perindopril arginine - FCA upholds issuance of NON-W letter and cancellation of reconsideration process...more

Rx IP Update - November 2018

In This Issue: Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due to “promise doctrine” - In an action by Apotex for compensation from...more

Rx IP Update - August 2018

Teva succeeds in section 8 bortezomib action; infringement counterclaim dismissed - On July 18, 2018, Justice Locke of the Federal Court granted Teva’s claim for compensation under section 8 of the Patented Medicines...more

34 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide