Latest Posts › Patent Litigation

Share:

Federal Circuit Reverses Injunction That Barred Clinical Trials in Jazz v. Avadel

The Federal Circuit recently considered the scope of a permanent injunction that prohibited a drug manufacturer from conducting certain clinical and regulatory activities in Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Avadel CNS...more

Can Clinical Trials Negate Patentability for Pharma Inventions?

The answer to this inquiry is “yes” — but maybe “no.” Will confidentiality agreements shield any prior art concerns? Once again, maybe “yes” — but maybe “no.” Indeed, do clinical trials constitute an experimental use that...more

Recent Decisions and FTC Challenges Dictate Caution When Listing Patents in the Orange Book

In October 2023, Teva Pharmaceuticals filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Amneal Pharmaceuticals alleging that their generic version of Teva’s ProAir® HFA inhaler infringed upon the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos....more

The Not-So-Safe Harbor for Research Tools: Lessons From the District of Delaware

In BlueAllele Corp. v. Intellia Therapeutics, Inc., 2024 U.S. Dist. Lexis 222094 (D. Del. Dec. 9, 2024)1, the District of Delaware addressed several issues relevant to the safe harbor defense in Hatch-Waxman litigation. ...more

Should the Experimental Use Exception Be Broadened?

On June 28, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) requested the public’s views on the current state of the common law experimental use exception to patent infringement and whether legislative action...more

The Final Word on an Alleged Infringer’s Intent in a Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Analysis

We have been monitoring the dispute between Edwards Lifesciences Corp. (“Edwards”) and Meril Life Sciences Pvt., Ltd. (“Meril”) before and after the initial Federal Circuit decision. The dispute focused on whether Meril’s...more

REGENXBIO v. SAREPTA: Make Sure You’re Safely Within the Safe Harbor Before Using a “Research Tool”

Are patented products that are not themselves subject to FDA approval, but used to develop products that are subject to FDA approval, protected under the Hatch-Waxman safe harbor? While courts have reached different...more

Ensnarement Defense To Doctrine of Equivalents Succeeds On Summary Judgment

Ensnarement is a potent, albeit rarely used, defense to allegations of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. It is based on the principle that the allowable range of equivalents to a patent claim cannot encompass or...more

California Court Confirms that Venue Does Not Require a Nexus Between an “Act of Infringement” and a “Regular and Established...

In Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co., 18-cv-1518 JLS (JLB) (S.D. Cal.), the California district court denied Lilly’s motion to dismiss for improper venue under the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b). Opinion, Sept....more

Venue in Hatch-Waxman Actions is Governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) Not § 1391(b)

Some commentators have suggested that since Hatch-Waxman actions share certain similarities with declaratory judgment (“DJ”) actions to prevent future infringement, venue in such actions should be governed by the general...more

Court Confirms "Unique" Pleading Requirements In Hatch-Waxman Actions

In a March 31, 2019 opinion in Belcher Pharmaceuticals LLC v. International Mediation Systems, Limited, Judge Stark of the Delaware District Court held that complaints in Hatch-Waxman actions can satisfy the requirements...more

Who Can Be A Defendant In Biosimilar Patent Litigation?

Can a party that did not submit an abbreviated biologics license application or an abbreviated new drug application, but will market the biosimilar or generic product after U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, be sued...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide