Takeaway: We have written many articles about the use of consumer-facing terms containing mandatory arbitration agreements. “Clickwrap” agreements – agreements that require consumers affirmatively to accept terms – are the...more
Takeaway: Is a label clearly false or only ambiguously false? Where a label is ambiguous – and therefore subject to an interpretation that would render it deceptive – the ambiguity can be clarified by fine print. The fine...more
Takeaway: We have written many articles about how businesses seek to enter enforceable arbitration agreements containing class action waivers with their customers, whether through “browsewrap” or “clickwrap” agreements or by...more
Takeaway: Technology advances. Business processes evolve. Internet transactions become increasingly ubiquitous. Contract formation, however, remains an old-fashioned concept. An Internet consumer must, at a minimum, be...more
Takeaway: We have written many articles about including class action waivers in consumer-facing arbitration agreements as a means of reducing class action litigation risk. The key to enforcing those waivers is the...more
Takeaway: We have written many articles about the implementation of arbitration agreements and class action waivers as mechanisms to reduce exposure to class action litigation. One of the most effective means of...more
Takeaway: When evaluating the fairness of a proposed class settlement, Federal Rule 23(e)(2) requires a district court to take into account, among other considerations, the terms of any proposed award of attorneys’ fees and...more
Takeaway: We have written about the use of survey-based conjoint analyses to prove class-wide damages. See Ninth Circuit summarily reverses exclusion of conjoint survey with “major flaws” (January 18, 2022). Recently,...more
Takeaway: We have written several articles about the development of Georgia common law in data breach litigation. In one article, we discussed the Georgia Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Labor v. McConnell, 305...more
Takeaway: Federal Rule 23 authorizes representative litigation in the form of class actions that satisfy its various requirements. The policy underlying the rule is efficiency. For example, the numerosity element (Rule...more
Takeaway: We have written about Eleventh Circuit decisions on Article III standing and its relationship to the proper approval of a class action settlement. See Eleventh Circuit holds that every class member must have...more
Takeaway: There are, essentially, two ways to defeat a RICO class action: through the denial of class certification or by the dismissal of the RICO claims on the merits. We have written a number of articles about both the...more
Atlanta Partner Jay Bogan recently covered the Eleventh Circuit in his new Class Action blog post discussing the TCPA Standing Ruling....more
We have written about the Eleventh Circuit’s controversial ruling in Salcedo v. Hanna, 936 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2019). See Eleventh Circuit reinvigorates Spokeo in single text message TCPA case (Sep. 11, 2019). In Salcedo,...more
Partner Jay Bogan discusses the Fifth Circuit affirming of district court’s striking of class allegations and dismissal of inadequately alleged fraud-based claims....more
Takeaway: We have written several articles about motions to strike class action allegations. See, e.g., Motions to strike: Eighth Circuit reverses district court refusal to strike class allegations (July 29, 2021). In a...more
Takeaway: Statutes that impose per-violation statutory damages, like the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), can lead to astronomical class action verdicts. In Wakefield v. ViSalus, Inc., 51 F.4th 1109 (2022), a Ninth...more
Takeaway: To control litigation risk, a business might include an arbitration clause and class action waiver in its consumer-facing terms and conditions. When a consumer files a putative class action against that business,...more
Takeaway: Businesses oftentimes rely on contractual provisions to shield themselves from litigation risk. But some provisions are more effective than others. In Baton v. Ledger SAS, No. 21-17036, 2022 WL 17352192 (9th Cir....more
Takeaway: Over two years ago, the Eastern District of Texas denied a motion to dismiss a putative civil RICO class action alleging an “overcharge-by-fraud” theory, where the class representatives appeared to have suffered no...more
Takeaway: Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, 568 U.S. 398, 416 (2013), that plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves based on . . . hypothetical...more
11/30/2022
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Cybersecurity ,
Data Breach ,
Data Protection ,
Data Security ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Personal Information ,
Popular ,
Standing
We have written about class actions filed against State Farm and other carriers alleging systematic undervaluation of damaged vehicles. See, e.g., Eleventh Circuit emphasizes the abuse of discretion standard in affirming the...more
Takeaway: We have written a number of articles about standing issues arising in data breach class actions. See, e.g., Data breach class actions: Third Circuit sets out parameters for Article III injury-in-fact (Oct. 27,...more
Takeaway: We have written a number of articles about the kinds of intangible injuries that confer Article III standing in the data breach and credit reporting contexts. See Data breach class actions: Southern District of...more
Takeaway: State wiretap acts have been around for a long time, and they can provide greater protection to victims of intercepted communications than the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510. These statutes generally...more