Episode 400: Reopening 9/11 -- A UK Supreme Court Battle Over Truth, Power, and Accountability
One Year After Horn: How Lower Courts Are Applying RICO's Expanded Damages — RICO Report Podcast
Workplace Mental Health: Strategies for Stress and Anxiety Relief
The Impact of the Horn Case on RICO - RICO Report Podcast
The Standard Formula Podcast | Assessing Prudential Insurance Regulation in Japan
Podcast - Ohio State Senator Has a Bone to Pick with Court Ruling on Boneless Wings
Supreme Court to Settle Circuit Split Regarding RICO Damages Arising From Personal Injuries — RICO Report Podcast
How Safetyism Is Driving High Plaintiff Verdicts - IMS Insights Podcast Episode 68
The Chartwell Chronicles: Tort Reform
Safety-ism & Jury Trials – IMS Insights Podcast Episode 61
Risk Transfer, Employer Liability, and Grave Injuries: Who Is Going to Pay?
Working to End Child Abuse with Kathryn Robb, Executive Director of ChildUSAdvocacy: On Record PR
Episode 9 | Don't Learn Safety by Accident: A Look at Worker Safety and OSHA Initiatives Under the Biden Administration
Law Brief®: Rich Schoenstein and Marie Pereira Discuss High-Profile Verdicts
Video Upload Test
Podcast - The Briefing by the IP Law Blog: Defamation by Docudrama – Inventing Anna
The Briefing by the IP Law Blog: Defamation by Docudrama – Inventing Anna
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 347: Listen and Learn -- Assumption of Risk (Torts)
Law Brief®: Rich Schoenstein Discusses Depp v. Heard Verdict
Law Brief®: Joel Rosner and Richard Schoenstein Discuss Palin vs. The Times
The cost of hazing can be catastrophic. Every year, families hear stories about students whose lives were impacted by hazing – stories about students participating in activities that led to injuries like the loss of sight,...more
“The law does not require a proprietor of a public place to maintain his premises in such condition that an accident could not possibly happen to a customer.” Rather, Florida law requires that adults must use their ordinary...more
The Supreme Court of Canada has significantly expanded the legal framework surrounding family violence. In its landmark decision in Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, the Court formally recognized a new tort of intimate partner...more
On May 14, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark unanimous ruling that will fundamentally reshape trucking and freight brokerage litigation....more
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in holding that state-law claims alleging a freight broker negligently hired/selected a motor carrier to transport goods are not preempted by the Federal Aviation...more
On May 14, 2026, a unanimous Supreme Court decision held that state-law negligent-hiring claims against freight brokers are not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA or F4A). The...more
In In re Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, the Supreme Court of Texas held that a “passive shipper” (a customer that simply engages a federally regulated motor carrier to transport ordinary goods) does not owe a legal duty of care to...more
Receiving a defective medical device can have major consequences. Serious infections, internal injuries, and the need for revision or replacement surgery are all very real risks....more
Motorcycle accidents often create immediate pressure. Medical bills start arriving. The bike may be unusable. Work may be interrupted. An insurance adjuster may call quickly, sometimes before the injured rider or family has a...more
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its anticipated decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, sending shockwaves across the transportation industry....more
The system is what it is. You are a corporate defendant walking into a Downtown Los Angeles courthouse, and you already know the score. It is hot, the air in the hallways is thick with the smell of floor wax and quiet...more
Today, in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, a unanimous Supreme Court held that negligent carrier selection claims are saved by the FAAAA’s safety exception. Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, applied a...more
A recent decision from Ontario’s highest court has yielded an unusual result regarding Ontario’s ever-evolving summary judgment regime. Typically, motions for partial summary judgment are difficult to advance and, in many...more
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States resolved a circuit split1 when it unanimously (9-0) ruled in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC (Caribe). It held that a claim against a broker that negligently...more
In a short, unanimous decision delivered by Justice Barrett on May 14, the United States Supreme Court in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC et al. ruled that the FAAAA does not preempt state law negligent hiring claims...more
The decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC confirms that freight brokers may face state-law claims when they select unsafe motor carriers to transport goods....more
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a negligent-hiring claim against a freight broker is not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA), raising the risk of...more
In a unanimous 9-0 decision issued today in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, the Supreme Court has fundamentally altered the liability landscape for the freight brokerage industry. The Court, reversing the Seventh...more
Today, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al., unanimously holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (the “FAA Authorization...more
In Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, No. 24-1238 (U.S. May 14, 2026), the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision addressing whether negligent selection claims against transportation brokers are preempted by federal law....more
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions: Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, No. 24-1238: This case addresses the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act’s (“FAAAA”)...more
In a unanimous decision released May 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) does not preempt state-law claims that a freight broker negligently selected an...more
In 2021, the Supreme Court of New Jersey adopted the “Ongoing Storm Rule” in Pareja v. Princeton International Properties, 246 N.J. 546 (2021). The “Ongoing Storm Rule” stands for the proposition that commercial landowners...more
This article is a brief update following confirmation on 29 April 2026 that the Crime and Policing Bill received Royal Assent. Through this bill, the limitation law in child sexual abuses cases in England and Wales will be...more
In a unanimous decision issued Thursday, the United States Supreme Court ruled that state-law negligent-hiring claims against transportation brokers are not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act...more