News & Analysis as of

Antitrust Violations › State Attorneys General › No-Poaching

Cozen O'Connor

NY and NJ Settle with Building Services Contractor Over No-Poach Agreements

Cozen O'Connor on

New York AG Letitia James, New Jersey AG Matthew Platkin, and the FTC settled with building services contractor Guardian Service Industries, Inc. to resolve allegations that it entered into no-poach agreements in violation of...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Q3 2024: Quarterly Cartel Catch-Up

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Despite the summer doldrums, cartel enforcers around the world had several notable enforcement actions and, perhaps more importantly, signaled a busy fall and winter. In the United States, the Department of Justice’s...more

Cozen O'Connor

The State AG Report – 10.26.2023

Cozen O'Connor on

Here are curated AG and federal regulatory news stories highlighting key areas in which state and federal regulators’ decisions are having an impact across the US: • Bipartisan AGs Step Up to the Plate to Challenge Baseball...more

Cozen O'Connor

AG James Reaches $3.5 Million Settlement with Nation’s Largest Title Insurance Company

Cozen O'Connor on

New York AG Letitia James announced a settlement with Fidelity National Financial, Inc. to resolve allegations that the title insurance company entered into no-poach agreements in violation of state antitrust laws....more

Benesch

Just like 2021, the DOJ and FTC will remain active in the Restrictive Covenant Space

Benesch on

2021 saw significant activity by both the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in 2021. The DOJ, for example, finally followed through on its 2016 warning/threat to investigate and potentially...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Illinois Attorney General’s Office on the Lookout for Unlawful No-Poach Agreements

Epstein Becker & Green on

In January of this year, our colleagues Janene Marasciullo and David Clark wrote about federal criminal indictments issued for naked wage-fixing and no-poach agreements. They warned that these federal indictments should serve...more

King & Spalding

No Poach Investigations

King & Spalding on

Agreements between companies not to solicit or to hire each other’s employees (“no poach agreements”) have been in antitrust enforcers’ crosshairs for several years now. In 2016, the DOJ and the FTC released their joint...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Open Season for Poaching in Washington

Lewitt Hackman on

Washington State’s Attorney General settled a case against sandwich franchisor, Jersey Mike’s, over antipoaching provisions in its franchise agreements. Since 2018, Washington State has made agreements with more than 60...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Spotlight on No-Poach Agreements Continues, Expands to New Industries

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In recent weeks, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson has continued to expand his efforts to eradicate the use of no-poach agreements by employers. The targets of his investigation are companies that have included...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Thrust Into Antitrust

Lewitt Hackman on

Jimmy John’s will face antitrust claims, after an Illinois federal judge declined to dismiss allegations in a class action. Plaintiffs claim the chain’s franchise agreement harmed competition by preventing franchisee...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: No Poach for You

Lewitt Hackman on

Franchise agreements commonly prohibit the franchisee from soliciting or hiring workers employed by the franchisor or other franchisees. This may take the form of “no-hire” or “no-switching” clauses that prohibit hiring each...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide