News & Analysis as of

Canada Dismissals

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada dismisses Apotex’s application for leave to appeal macitentan inducing infringement decision

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of a decision relating to macitentan (Janssen’s OPSUMIT), which found that Apotex would induce infringement of Janssen’s patent....more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of SPRAVATO “innovative drug” decision

Smart & Biggar on

On November 10, 2021, the Minister of Health refused to reassess its decision that Janssen’s esketamine hydrochloride product (SPRAVATO) was not an “innovative drug” and therefore not entitled to data protection. As...more

Bennett Jones LLP

“Utter Waste of Time”: Alberta Court of Appeal Provides New Guidance on Civil Practice Note 7

Bennett Jones LLP on

Civil Practice Note 7, entitled “Vexatious Application/Proceeding Show Cause Procedure” (CPN 7), is a useful tool to manage hopeless litigation quickly and efficiently. Introduced in 2018, it is a summary procedure under Rule...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Meal Delivery Service’s Mandatory Arbitration Clause for Couriers Unconscionable: Manitoba Court of Appeal

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

The Manitoba Court of Appeal (the “Court”) in Pokornik v. SkipTheDishes Restaurant Services Inc., 2024 MBCA 3, recently upheld a lower court decision dismissing a large online meal delivery service’s motion to stay a class...more

Smart & Biggar

Twice is not nice – second notice of allegation may be abusive

Smart & Biggar on

On December 23, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) held that it was an abuse of process for Apotex to raise invalidity in defending actions under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations)...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Beyond Serious Prejudice: The BCCA Establishes a New Test to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution

Bennett Jones LLP on

Not infrequently, a plaintiff loses interest in pursuing litigation without being willing to discontinue or settle, or starts litigation to preserve a limitation period without being committed to pursue it. Rule 22-7(7) of...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal relating to Minister of Health’s decision to disclose records pursuant to Access to...

Smart & Biggar on

On November 1, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Actial’s appeal from an application for judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to disclose records pursuant to a request under the Access to...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA dismisses appeal, patent not listable against STELARA SNDS

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court (FC) dismissed Janssen’s application for judicial review of the decision of the Office of Submissions and Intellectual Property (OSIP) refusing to list Canadian Patent No. 3,113,837...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Ontario's Dismissal for Delay Regime the Year in Review

Bennett Jones LLP on

Early 2022 decisions interpreting Ontario’s new mandatory dismissal for delay regime were glad tidings for defendants, suggesting the regime would be strictly applied. However, over the course of 2022, the pendulum swung in...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal challenging amended basket of comparator countries in PMPRB Regulations

Smart & Biggar on

On December 5, 2022, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Innovative Medicines Canada (IMC) and sixteen innovative pharmaceutical companies’ appeal regarding the validity of the amended basket of comparator countries...more

Smart & Biggar

Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of Apotex’s Statutes of Monopolies and Trademarks Act claims regarding olanzapine

Smart & Biggar on

On March 8, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Apotex’s claims against Eli Lilly (Lilly) under the Statute of Monopolies, Trademarks Act, and common law conspiracy relating to Canadian Patent No. 2,041,113...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds Minister of Health reasonable in concluding JAMP not a ‘second person’ for its SIMLANDI biosimilar

Smart & Biggar on

On August 17, 2022, the Federal Court, per Justice Fothergill, dismissed AbbVie’s applications for judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decisions that (1) JAMP was not a “second person” and therefore it was not...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds invalidity of fampridine patent

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed an appeal by Biogen and a cross-appeal by Taro from a decision of the Federal Court... dismissing two actions by Biogen under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada denies leave to appeal refusal of NHP licence for BOLUOKE

Smart & Biggar on

On May 12, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an application by Canada RNA Biochemical (C-RNA) for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39994) a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal relating to the refusal of a Natural...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Trends in Canadian Wrongful Dismissal Cases

Bennett Jones LLP on

How Recent Decisions Signal a Potentially Expanded Approach to Aggravated and Punitive Damages - Two recent decisions: Moffatt v Prospera Credit Union [Moffat], from the British Columbia Supreme Court, and Russell v The...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds Minister of Health’s refusal to grant NHP licence for BOLUOKE

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, McHaffie J. of the Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review brought by Canada RNA Biochemical (C-RNA), concluding that the Minister of Health (Minister) was reasonable in refusing to...more

Littler

Ontario, Canada: Arbitrator Upholds Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy

Littler on

On November 9, 2021, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Canada Local 333 v. Paragon Protection Ltd. (Paragon), Arbitrator Von Veh in Ontario dismissed a union’s policy grievance and upheld a mandatory COVID-19...more

Smart & Biggar

Ontario Superior Court dismisses Apotex’s Statutes of Monopolies claims regarding sildenafil

Smart & Biggar on

On September 27, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted Pfizer’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Apotex’s claims for treble damages and double costs under the Ontario and English Statutes of Monopolies,...more

Smart & Biggar

PM(NOC) Regulations: Fourth year following major amendments

Smart & Biggar on

September 21, 2021 marked the fourth anniversary of the significant amendments to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations). This article provides an update on activities in the fourth year...more

Littler

Ontario, Canada: Divisional Court Overturns Decision Holding That Workplace Safety and Insurance Act Barred Constructive Dismissal...

Littler on

In 2020, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) confirmed that when a claim for constructive dismissal is based on harm sustained due to harassment and bullying in the workplace, the claim falls within...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

La Cour suprême du Canada se prononce à l’unanimité sur la prescription et la possibilité de découvrir des dommages

Dans l’arrêt Grant Thornton LLP c. Nouveau-Brunswick, la Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC ») a statué à l’unanimité que le délai de prescription commence à courir lorsque les faits à l’origine d’une réclamation sont...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds decision finding Seedlings' LifeCard patent invalid and not infringed by Pfizer’s EpiPen

Smart & Biggar on

On July 28, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Seedling’s appeal from the Federal Court decision of Justice Grammond (2020 FC 1, previously reported), which concluded that certain claims of Seedlings' LifeCard...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Limitation Periods and Discoverability in Unanimous Decision

In Grant Thornton LLP v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously held that a claim is discovered – and the limitation period begins to run – when the plaintiff knows, or ought to know, the material facts...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal confirms Janssen’s SPRAVATO not eligible for data protection

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On November 10, 2021, the Minister rejected Janssen’s second request for data protection for SPRAVATO, which was submitted following the coming into force of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). The...more

Smart & Biggar

2021 Mid-Year Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

In the first half of 2021, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. The Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar has collected the top stories from January to June and...more

90 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide