News & Analysis as of

CPLR Commercial Court

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

From “Dissipation” to Denial: Why Threats of Lost Funds Are Not Enough for an Injunction

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Under CPLR 7502(c), a court in “the county in which an arbitration is pending…[is permitted to] entertain an application…for a preliminary injunction in connection with an arbitration that is pending or that is to be...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Obtaining Discovery Across International Borders: Convenience Is Not the Standard

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Sections 3102 and 3108 of the CPLR outline methods for conducting discovery, including discovery “outside” or “without” the state.  But what about demands for discovery and inspection of documents located outside the country?...more

Epstein Becker & Green

“Unsworn” Attorney Affirmations: Overlooked Side Effect of Changes to CPLR 2106

By now, most New York practitioners are aware (or at least have heard) of the recent changes to CPLR 2106, which was amended as of January 1, 2024 to allow “any person” to submit an affirmation “in lieu of and with the same...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Settlement Agreement Found To Be an Instrument for The Payment of Money Only Sufficient to Grant Summary Judgment In Lieu of...

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In past articles, we have examined a motion under CPLR § 3213... CPLR § 3213 is a procedural mechanism that allows a party to make a motion for summary judgment before filing a complaint in actions based upon “an instrument...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Ready or Not, Here I Come: The Expansion of Substitute Service by Email

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The old game of “hide-and-seek” brings many of us back to our childhood as one of our favorite ways to pass time during the summer. As commercial practitioners know, the concept of serving a summons and complaint in a case...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

“C’mon Ref!” – Right and Wrong Ways to Challenge the Call in a Supervised Disclosure Proceeding

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Section 3104 of the CPLR authorizes courts to appoint a judge or referee to supervise disclosure proceedings. The appointed referee enjoys “all the powers of the court” to resolve discovery disputes. A party seeking review of...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Guaranty Provision Requiring Some Additional Performance Obligations Held Insufficient to Defeat Motion for Summary Judgment In...

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In past articles, we have examined a motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint under CPLR § 3213. Today, we take another look at this statute by examining BBM3, LLC v. Vosotas, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02279 (1st Dept. ...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

CPLR 205(a) Can Only Be Invoked by the Original Plaintiff if Plaintiff Is Still Alive

Rivkin Radler LLP on

CPLR 205(a) is a well-known safety net in New York litigation, generally providing that a timely commenced action dismissed without prejudice can be refiled by “the plaintiff” within six months of dismissal, despite the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Narrow Escape of Expedited Judgment Under CPLR 3213 Due to Ambiguous Guaranty

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As readers of this blog are aware the CPLR 3213 motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint can be a powerful tool to secure an expedited judgment, “meld[ing] pleading and motion practice into one step, allowing a...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Updates to Commercial Division Rules Concerning Discovery of ESI

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As we approach the 30th Anniversary of New York’s Commercial Division, it’s fair to say that over those 30 years, the Commercial Division has held true to its aim of improving the efficiency and judicial treatment of complex...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Judgment Creditors Beware: Moving For Contempt May Be Within Reach, But Difficult To Grasp

In the New York County Commercial Division, Justice David B. Cohen’s ruling in B&M Kingstone, LLC v. Mega Int’l Comm. Bank Ltd., 2022 NY Slip Op. 30481(U) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty. 2022) makes clear that New York courts can compel...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

A Wave of E-Discovery Change: The Latest Proposal from the Advisory Council

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

New York’s Commercial Division has continuously taken the lead as an innovative forum, proposing rule changes that are aimed at increasing efficiency and overall effectiveness of the litigation process. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

New Supreme Court Rule on Summary Judgment Motions: “Just the Facts, Ma’am”

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Practitioners often choose to practice in the Commercial Division because of its well-documented efficiencies.  Thus, many were happy to hear that Chief Administrative Judge Larry Marks issued Administrative Order 270/2020...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Free Rein Venue Choices? Not So Fast Says the Commercial Division

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The principles of jurisdiction and venue are paramount when determining not only where a proceeding will be conducted, but also which particular laws will govern the proceeding. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Defenses and Counterclaims In a CPLR 3213 Action Are Only Successful If They’re “Inseparable”

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In one of my previous posts, I discussed the basic requirements for bringing a CPLR 3213 motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.  One such requirement (and the one that generates the largest body of case law), is...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

“I’ve Been Hacked!” (OK, But Have You Been Damaged?)

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A critical inquiry to be considered at the outset of any litigation is whether the party seeking relief is, in fact, a proper party to seek the court’s adjudication of the dispute. ...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Commercial Division Limits the Reach of New York’s Long-Arm Statute

In Black Diamond Aviation Grp. LLC v. Spirit Avionics, Ltd., 70 Misc. 3d 823 (Sup. Ct. Suffolk Cnty. 2020), Justice James Hudson of the Suffolk County Commercial Division limited the reach of New York’s long-arm statute, CPLR...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

NY Practice Tip: Protecting Your Client Against an Improper Notice to Admit

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The CPLR 3123 notice to admit can be a useful device in litigation.  Its primary purpose is to expedite a trial by eliminating the necessity of proving a readily admittible fact or matter not in dispute. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Commercial Division Continues to Rule Against Businesses Seeking Financial Relief Amidst COVID-19 Shutdowns

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

We all hoped ringing in the New Year would mean leaving some of the hardships from the COVID-19 pandemic behind in 2020. However, in just two short months, businesses struggling with rent and other financial obligations due...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

To Redact, or Not to Redact, That is the Question

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

You now have to collect, review and produce documents pursuant to the preliminary conference order.  And so, in collecting documents from the various custodians, it appears some of the documents contain truly “irrelevant”...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Court Determines New York’s Recently Amended Venue Provision Does Not Limit Where Lawsuits Between Non-Residents May Be Filed

In 2017, New York amended its general venue statute. For as long as New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules has existed, the general venue statute (CPLR § 503(a)) placed proper venue solely based on residence of the parties....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Pandemic Aftermath: The Rise Of Interstate Depositions And Discovery

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

With global commerce massively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, post-pandemic litigation will undoubtedly result in a rise of interstate depositions and discovery. In turn, litigants engaged in actions pending outside of...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

No Home Court Advantage for US Tennis Association: Court Finds Violation of Restraining Notice

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Looks like the United States Tennis Association (“UTA”) met its match, but this time not on its own court, but rather in another, the Appellate Division,  Second Department.   The court in Matter of Bravado Intl. Group...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Think Before You Speak: Words and Actions Can Bind You Beyond The Terms of a Previously Agreed Upon Subcontract Agreement

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In a recent case before Justice Andrea Masley, Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. v. Structure Tone, Inc. et al., Plaintiff Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. (“CET”), a subcontractor, was hired by Structure Tone,...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Avoiding Duplicative Litigation

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

State courts have long exercised discretionary power to stay proceedings where a suit involving the same parties and issues is already under way in another forum (see Asher v. Abbott Laboratories, 307 AD2d 211, 211-212 [1st...more

40 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide