News & Analysis as of

Damages Franchise Agreements

Akerman LLP

Leisure Law Insider (Vol. 2) - Winter 2024

Akerman LLP on

Welcome to the second edition of The Leisure Law Insider! It will be released quarterly, covering the latest news and developments in leisure and hospitality law, regulation, and policy. Expect content on hotels, franchising,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Blurry Choice of Remedies

Lewitt Hackman on

A Texas federal court denied a franchisor’s request to enjoin operations of a former franchisee’s competing optical retail stores for failure to establish likelihood of success on a claim of trade dress infringement. The...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Real Estate Case Serves as a Reminder About Adherence to the Terms of a Franchise Agreement—Until a Court Permits Otherwise

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Integrity Real Estate Consultants v. Re/Max of New York, Inc., a franchisee, Integrity Real Estate Consultants (“Integrity”), sued a real estate service provider franchisor, Re/Max of New York, Inc. (“Re/Max”), in New York...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #271

Lathrop GPM on

Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Action Settlement Approval and Fee Award - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed the approval of a $10 million voucher settlement and a $2.6 million attorneys’ fee award in a class...more

Lathrop GPM

Franchise Memorandum - Issue #270

Lathrop GPM on

Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Franchisees’ Minimum Wage and Unjust Enrichment Claims - A divided panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded that claims of improper wage deductions and unjust...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Recruitment Reprimand

Lewitt Hackman on

A Massachusetts state court ruled that real estate franchisor, Re/Max of New England (Franchisor), breached its franchise agreements, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and violated Massachusetts’ consumer...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: The (Ice Cream) Cart Before the Rescission

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Cleveland rejected a California franchisee’s claim that an Ohio-based ice cream franchisor violated the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL). The claim failed because the franchisee could not show it...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Proof Is in the Writing

Lewitt Hackman on

Ten years after the franchisor of the EXIT real estate system entered into a franchise agreement for a franchisee to operate an EXIT franchise in Maitland, Florida, the parties entered into another franchise agreement for a...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Florida Franchisor Awarded Lost Future Profits

Lewitt Hackman on

An arbitration panel in Florida found that a disaster recovery and remediation business franchisee breached his agreement with John Woods, his franchisor, by terminating the agreement 13 years before expiration of the 20-year...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide