News & Analysis as of

Disclosure Requirements Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Tandy Letter

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

SEC Proposes Rule to Shorten Settlement Period from T+3 to T+2; Eliminates Requirement for Tandy Language

Proposed rule to shorten settlement period from T+3 to T+2 - On September 28, 2016, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed an amendment to shorten the standard settlement cycle for broker-dealer...more

Stoel Rives LLP

In Case You Missed It - Interesting Items for Corporate Counsel - October 2016

Stoel Rives LLP on

After a one-month hiatus, we find ourselves with much to catch up on. Brace yourself. The SEC . . . - announced, that it no longer requires Tandy language, generally an acknowledgment in SEC comment...more

Dechert LLP

SEC Staff No Longer Requires “Tandy” Representations in Filing Reviews

Dechert LLP on

The staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on October 5, 2016 that, with immediate effect, it will no longer require companies to include “Tandy” representations in their disclosure filing review...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Tandy Reps are No More

The SEC announced on October 5th that, effective immediately, “Tandy” representations are no longer required in company responses to SEC comment letters. Practically speaking, this requires only a simple template modification...more

Allen Matkins

“Tandy Letter” Requests – RIP

Allen Matkins on

Broc Romanek reported yesterday that the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission will no longer require “Tandy Letter” disclaimers in responses to staff comments. Among other things, the Tandy Letter policy required...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide