News & Analysis as of

Due Process Statutory Interpretation Appeals

Epstein Becker & Green

Cleaning the Cupboard—Six More Decisions in One Day, and a Largely Harmonious Court - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

As the end of the term seems to be rushing towards us, the U.S. Supreme Court issued six more opinions yesterday, mostly unanimous or near unanimous....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 12, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions today: Parrish v. United States, No. 24-275: This case addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after the original deadline to appeal...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Timing is Everything: Retroactive Application of the Direct Action Statute Amendment

McGlinchey Stafford on

Louisiana’s Direct Action Statute was recently amended to remove the right of an injured person or, if deceased, the statutory beneficiaries, to bring a direct action claim against a tortfeasor’s insurer, except in certain,...more

Law Office of Jason Ostendorf

Issue Framing Is the New Battleground in Appellate Advocacy

In appellate practice, there was once comfort in formality. You started with the standard of review, cited black-letter law, and walked the court through a step-by-step application of precedent to facts. But a subtle shift...more

Holland & Knight LLP

New York Court of Appeals to Determine Whether FAPA Can Be Applied Retroactively

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in the matter of Article 13 LLC v. Ponce De Leon Fed. Bank, 132 F. 4th 586, 594 (2d Cir. 2025), certified the following questions to the New York Court of Appeals on March 25,...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Land banking after Tyler: No government taking where there’s a process (so says federal 6th Cir.)

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Land banking advocates across the country took notice of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County that found a “government taking” occurred when a Minnesota county sold a tax-foreclosed home to recover...more

Snell & Wilmer

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Section 1988 Attorney’s Fees for Property Owners and Other Civil Rights Litigants

Snell & Wilmer on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lackey v. Stinnie, 145 S. Ct. 659 (2025), limits the ability of civil rights litigants to recover their attorney fees under the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act, specifically...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 7, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in two cases: Ellingburg v. United States, No. 23-3129: This case addresses the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which the government...more

Venable LLP

SCOTUS Dodges Confrontation Clause Case, but Justices Are Open to Reconsidering Crawford

Venable LLP on

The Supreme Court refusing to hear a case is nothing new, but an otherwise run-of-the-mill denial of the cert petition in Franklin v. New York, 604 U.S. ____ (2025) was accompanied by statements from Justices Alito and...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Judge Newman Files Reply Brief in Newman v. Moore

The Honorable Pauline Newman, Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, has been battling her suspension from the Court imposed by the Judicial Council for two years (including proceedings leading...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

7th Circuit Update: What Martin v. Goodrich Means for IL’s Workers’ Compensation Landscape

Husch Blackwell LLP on

We previously reported that the Illinois Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Martin v. Goodrich Corp., upholding the constitutionality of a 2019 amendment to the Illinois Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act (the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - January 21, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision today: Andrew v. White, No. 23-6573: In this case, the Court addressed whether the State violated petitioner Brenda Andrew’s due process rights when, during her...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide