News & Analysis as of

Duty to Warn Failure To Warn

McGlinchey Stafford

Maritime Products Liability Law: Understanding the Fundamentals

McGlinchey Stafford on

The United States Supreme Court first recognized products liability, including strict liability, as part of the general maritime law in East River Steamship S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858 (1986). The...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Seventh Circuit Finds the Duty to Warn Can Extend to Packaging Manufactured by Another Company

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Can a company be found liable for failure to warn about hazards of another company’s product used in packaging for its own product?  What about when the company wasn’t warned that packaging could contain anything potentially...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket/Packing Manufacturer Fails Government Contractor Defense

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, October 21, 2022 - In this case, the plaintiffs Arnold and Ruth Pritt allege that Arnold Pritt (“Plaintiff”) was exposed to asbestos while serving in the...more

Goldberg Segalla

Pump Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Replacement Parts Denied; Court Critical of Corporate Representative Affidavit

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, October 11, 2022 In this asbestos action, the plaintiff Gloria Maryn alleged exposure to asbestos from laundering the clothes of her son, Victor Arana. Mr. Arana...more

Goldberg Segalla

Turbine Defendant Not Liable For Failure to Warn as to Third-Party Insulation

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, July 8, 2022 - In this asbestos matter, the defendant ViacomCBS Inc. (“Westinghouse”) moved for partial summary judgment as to Decedent Callen Cortez’s...more

Goldberg Segalla

New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Division and Reinstates Plaintiff’s Verdict

Goldberg Segalla on

New Jersey Supreme Court, June 30, 2022 - In this asbestos action, decedent Willis Edenfield (“Edenfield”) commenced a failure to warn product liability action against defendant Union Carbide. The Appellate Division...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Federal Court Tosses Fifteen-Year-Old Lead Paint Personal Injury Lawsuit

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On March 2, 2022, a Wisconsin federal judge dismissed Burton v. Am. Cyanamid Co., No. 07-C-0303, 2022 WL 623895 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 2, 2022), a lingering fifteen-year personal injury litigation against lead-based paint...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Tank Explosion/Hazardous Materials Transportation Act: Federal Court Considers Whether Alleged Failure to Warn Claim is Preempted

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Court”) addressed in a March 11th Opinion whether the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (“HMTA”) preempted certain state tort law claims in...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Product Liability 2021 Year in Review

Massachusetts federal and state courts issued several important product liability decisions in 2021. Nutter’s Product Liability practice group reviewed these cases and report on their significant holdings as follows...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Does Arkansas Law Recognize a Post-Sale Duty to Warn? (Part II)

Last week we wrote about the status of Arkansas’ law recognizing a post-sale duty to warn, ultimately concluding that Arkansas Courts have not recognized the existence of any such duty. This week we will explain how, despite...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Does Arkansas Law Recognize a Post-Sale Duty to Warn?

Does Arkansas law recognize a post-sale duty to warn? In a nutshell, no. While Arkansas state courts have not expressly considered the issue, all legal authority indicates that the answer is indeed “no.” To support this...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Limits Failure to Warn Claims Against Medical Device Manufacturers

Snell & Wilmer on

On December 18, 2018, the Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion clarifying manufacturers’ duty to warn consumers under Arizona common law. The Court held that the federal Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”) impliedly...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Product Liability Update: January 2018

Foley Hoag LLP on

First Circuit Holds Foreseeability of Health Risk Is Standard For Failure To Warn Even Though Claim Is For Property Remediation, And Bulk-Selling Chemical Manufacturer Had Post-Sale Duty To Warn Only Direct Customers Even If...more

Knobbe Martens

Medical Device Manufacturers’ Duty to Warn Expands

Knobbe Martens on

The Washington State Supreme Court recently released its decision in Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. where it held that Washington law requires medical device manufacturers to warn hospitals that purchase their products of...more

Cozen O'Connor

Washington: Product Manufacturers Must Warn Hospitals; May Be Strictly Liable for Failure to Warn

Cozen O'Connor on

In Washington, manufacturers of medical devices now have a duty to warn hospitals that purchase their devices. Additionally, product manufacturers of “unavoidably unsafe products” face strict liability for failure to warn...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

What The Intuitive Ruling Means For Medical Device Makers

Last month, in Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical Inc., the Washington Supreme Court saddled medical device manufacturers with a new duty to warn under Washington law — the duty to warn hospitals about potential risks their...more

Polsinelli

California Supreme Court Adopts the Sophisticated Intermediary Defense

Polsinelli on

In Webb v. Special Elec. Co., the California Supreme Court formally adopted the "sophisticated intermediary doctrine," which provides an additional defense that manufacturers and suppliers can assert against product liability...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Product Liability Update - October 2015

Foley Hoag LLP on

Massachusetts Federal Court Holds Proof of Testing of Proposed Alternative Design Not Required in Design Defect Claim, Evidence Plaintiff Ignored Defendant’s Warnings Did Not Establish He Was Sole Proximate Cause of Injury on...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide