News & Analysis as of

Enhanced Penalties

McDermott Will & Emery

An Update on Section 6751 Penalties

McDermott Will & Emery on

Tax penalties are always a hot topic here. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a large arsenal when it comes to grounds for asserting penalties on income tax deficiencies, ranging from the common 20% penalty under Internal...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Proposes Major Revision of Statewide Penalty Policy

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Texas companies may soon see increasing penalties for noncompliance with Texas environmental laws. On September 30, 2020, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) announced significant proposed changes to the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

New California Legislation for Trust and Estate Attorneys to Watch in 2020

Holland & Knight LLP on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed into law a number of bills that will affect Trust and Estate attorneys, and which are effective as of Jan. 1, 2020. In addition, three new laws make changes to civil discovery...more

King & Spalding

FDA Issues Proposed Rule and Draft Guidance on Drug Importation

King & Spalding on

In late December 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), an agency operating within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), issued two documents—a Proposed Rule and a Draft Guidance—intended to establish two...more

White & Case LLP

New Bill: Enhancement of Fines under the Japan Anti-Monopoly Act

White & Case LLP on

The bill to amend the Anti-Monopoly Act (the "AMA"), that includes the enhancement of a surcharge (i.e., administrative fine), has passed on June 19, 2019.1 It will be effective no later than from December 25, 2020. The...more

McDermott Will & Emery

A Notice of Deficiency Is Not Set in Stone

McDermott Will & Emery on

A recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit reminds taxpayers to be aware that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is not necessarily locked in to the positions and arguments stated in the...more

King & Spalding

Energy Newsletter - October 2016

King & Spalding on

Negotiating an In-Project Construction Dispute - Many thorny and competing interests are implicated when an ongoing major construction project experiences an unanticipated event that impacts the project schedule or...more

King & Spalding

FERC Enforcement Targets Entitled To Due Process Protections In De Novo Review Of Penalty Assessments

King & Spalding on

In a line of much-anticipated decisions, two federal district courts ruled to protect the procedural due process rights of entities targeted by FERC enforcement actions. Recent decisions in Massachusetts and the District of...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Are Patent Opinions Again Necessary?

Troutman Pepper Locke on

Patent opinions are no longer necessary to avoid an inference at trial that the opinion would have been unfavorable, but, in view of the recent Supreme Court decisions in Halo and Octane Fitness they may be advisable upon...more

WilmerHale

Scope Of The Jury Trial Right In Civil FIRREA Actions

WilmerHale on

In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice has stepped up its use of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 to pursue civil enforcement actions against financial institutions and their...more

WilmerHale

The Scope Of SEC Defendants' Jury Trial Right: Part 3

WilmerHale on

This is the third of four articles examining the scope of the Seventh Amendment jury trial right for civil defendants in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement actions. Our first article explained why the Seventh...more

Mintz

Federal Circuit Reverses Punitive Exceptional Case Fee Award as Improperly Enhanced

Mintz on

On January 22, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Lumen View Technology LLC v. FindTheBest.com (Dkt. No. 15-1275), in which it vacated and remanded the lower court’s award of enhanced attorney fees under 35...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court to Review Federal Circuit Standard for Treble Damage Awards Under § 284 - Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse...

McDermott Will & Emery on

Taking its first IP cases of the current session, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two § 284 enhanced fee award patent cases: Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., S.Ct. No. 14-1513 (Oct. 19, 2015) and...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether to Relax the Standard for Award of Enhanced Patent Damages

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court announced last week that it will decide two cases concerning the issue of when district courts may award enhanced damages to patentees upon a finding of infringement. Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, U.S., No....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Supreme Court to Review Enhanced Damages -- Octane Revisited, or Something Entirely Different?

On October 19, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two related cases: Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. (Supreme Court docket number 14-1513) and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc. (Supreme Court docket...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Southern Mills Files Patent Suit Against Int’l Textiles over its Glide™ Product

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Southern Mills, Inc. (“Southern Mills”), a Georgia corporation doing business as TenCate Protective Fabrics, filed a patent infringement action on July 15, 2015 against International Textiles Group, Inc. f/k/a Safety...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide