News & Analysis as of

Federal v State Law Application Supreme Court of the United States Jurisdiction

Husch Blackwell LLP

FAAAA Circuit Split Remains Unresolved as U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Gauthier vs. TQL

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On January 13, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari in the case of Gauthier vs. Total Quality Logistics, leaving the decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals intact. This means that freight...more

DarrowEverett LLP

Litigating Arbitration Awards: Federal Courts Decline to Punch the Jurisdictional Ticket

DarrowEverett LLP on

Over two years ago, the United States Supreme Court divested the federal courts of jurisdiction over all but a few disputes concerning the confirmation or vacation of arbitration awards. Since then, the federal appellate...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

In Decision With Important Tax and Bankruptcy Implications, Supreme Court Rejects Application of So-Called 'Bob Richards Rule'

In its recent decision in Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., No. 18–1269 (Sup. Ct. Feb. 25, 2020), the Supreme Court held that federal courts may not apply the federal common law “Bob Richards Rule” to determine...more

A&O Shearman

The Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Bob Richards Rule Creates Uncertainty Regarding the Entitlement of Members of a Consolidated...

A&O Shearman on

On February 25, 2020, the United States Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation struck down a judicial federal common law rule—known as the Bob Richards rule—that is used by courts to allocate tax...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Use of Bob Richards Rule to Determine Ownership of Tax Refund Within Consolidated Group:...

On February 25, 2020, in Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, No. 18-1269 (U.S. 2020), the U.S. Supreme Court effectively ruled that the so-called “Bob Richards rule” should not be used to determine which...more

King & Spalding

Still The Least Dangerous Branch: Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Federal Common Law Does Not Govern Corporate Tax Refund...

King & Spalding on

On February 25, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion vacating a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit applying federal common law to determine the allocation of a corporate...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court Tackles Tax-Related Cases

McDermott Will & Emery on

The United States Supreme Court has picked up the pace this week, already issuing eight regular opinions and four opinions relating to orders as of today. We discuss the tax-related items here. In Rodriguez v. FDIC, the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

On February 25, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, No. 18-1269, overruling a federal common law rule that was used in some circumstances to determine how to distribute the tax...more

BCLP

Death of the Bob Richards Rule? Supreme Court Limits Federal Common Law (Rodrigues v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.)

BCLP on

When can a Federal Court employ a federal common law rule to make its decision in the case? Justice Gorsuch answer this in Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., U.S., No. 18-1269, 2/25/20. The answer...less often than you...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Who Decides the “Class Arbitrability” Issue: Fifth Circuit Joins Consensus That It Is a Court, Not an Arbitrator, But Evidently...

Add the Fifth Circuit to the growing list of Federal Circuit Courts that have decided that “class arbitrability” is a gateway question for a court, rather than an arbitrator, to decide in the first instance, absent the...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Said “No” to Class Arbitration in Employment-Related Data Breach Dispute Because Arbitration Agreement...

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two 5-4 decisions in as many months regarding class procedures. Lamp Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U. S. ____ (2019) was favorable to corporate defendants by limiting the availability of class...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Rules Class Arbitrations Must Be Explicitly Authorized

King & Spalding on

On April 24, 2019, in a 5-4 decision split along ideological lines, the Supreme Court held in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela that class arbitration is not available where arbitration agreements are unclear about whether the...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Good News for Employers: Express Consent Required for Class Arbitration

Last year, the United States Supreme Court ruled that class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable. But, the ruling did not address an agreement that is silent or ambiguous regarding the intent to...more

Vedder Price

Class-Wide Arbitration May Not Be Compelled in the Face of an “Ambiguous” Arbitration Agreement

Vedder Price on

In a case with important implications for employers, Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, the United States Supreme Court held that class-wide arbitration may not be compelled pursuant to an arbitration agreement that is ambiguous as...more

Carlton Fields

Supreme Court’s Lamp Plus Brings Ambiguity in Classwide Arbitration to Light

Carlton Fields on

In 2016, a hacker tricked an employee of petitioner Lamps Plus Inc. into disclosing tax information of about 1,300 company employees. ...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Says Arbitration Agreements Exclude Class Arbitration Absent Consent

In last year’s Epic Systems decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows mandatory arbitration agreements that preclude class or collective action claims. In other words, a party to the...more

Vedder Price

SCOTUS Catapults Class Arbitration Onto the Endangered Species List

Vedder Price on

On April 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision touching a number of hot button issues and litigation threats facing American businesses — including class actions, arbitration agreements and data...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Individualized Arbitration Where Agreement Is Ambiguous on Issue of Class Arbitration

In a 2010 decision, Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp., the United States Supreme Court held that parties may not be compelled to submit to class arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) unless...more

Snell & Wilmer

United States Supreme Court Continues Its Trend of Enforcing Individual Employment Arbitration Agreements

Snell & Wilmer on

Approximately one year ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Epic Systems v. Lewis, 548 U.S. ___ (2018), holding that class action waivers contained in arbitration agreements, including...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Lights out for class arbitration – Lamps Plus holds that class arbitration cannot be read into ambiguous arbitration clauses

Consistent with prior US Supreme Court opinions, the Supreme Court held on April 24, 2019, that contractual ambiguity regarding class arbitration may not be construed against the drafter because of Federal Arbitration Act...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Holds No Class Arbitration Absent Express Consent: Four Things to Know

Morgan Lewis on

The US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus means that parties with arbitration agreements governed by the Federal Arbitration Act may now compel arbitration without worrying that the court will order class...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Ambiguous Arbitration Agreements Do Not Authorize Class Arbitration

Ambiguous language in an arbitration agreement is not a sufficient basis for concluding a party has agreed to class arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week....more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Supreme Court Rules on Enforcement of Class Arbitration

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

The Supreme Court ruled on April 24, 2019 that an arbitration agreement which is ambiguous as to whether the parties had agreed to class arbitration was insufficient to require a party to participate in class arbitration. ...more

A&O Shearman

Supreme Court Holds That Parties Must Unambiguously Consent To Class Arbitration

A&O Shearman on

On April 24, 2019, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, held that an agreement ambiguous as to whether arbitration had been agreed for class claims as well as individual claims...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Finds Classwide Arbitration Available Only When Clearly Set Forth in Contract

Cozen O'Connor on

On April 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Lamps Plus v. Varela that should be of interest to the maritime industry. Even though our industry has long relied upon mandatory arbitration clauses in its...more

50 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide