News & Analysis as of

Implied Warranties Construction Industry

Winstead PC

Arbitration for All: Texas Supreme Court Hands Down Two Big Wins for Developers and Builders Seeking to Enforce Arbitration...

Winstead PC on

While it may seem evident that household members and subsequent purchasers bringing a construction defect claim are bound by the arbitration provision contained in the purchase and sale contract for the home, that was not the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Zombie Warranties: Courts Resurrecting Disclaimed or Waived Implied Warranties in Home Construction Contracts

Certain home construction contracts include clauses waiving implied warranties, such as the implied warranty of good workmanship and habitability. However, courts at times refuse to enforce such waivers, as the Arizona...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Importance of Implied Warranties of Workmanship and Habitability

Snell & Wilmer on

n late September 2022, Arizona’s Supreme Court issued a new opinion important for any person or company working in residential construction. The Court’s opinion in Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC, et al affirms the importance of...more

Miller Nash LLP

Owner’s Design Defects Can Excuse Contractor’s Own Defective Performance

Miller Nash LLP on

Generally, the implied warranty of the adequacy of the plans and specifications, also known as the Spearin Doctrine, allocates risk to the owner for any defect in the design of the project. This influential federal decision...more

Dickinson Wright

Builders Beware: The Implied Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability Is Set in Stone

Dickinson Wright on

To protect homebuyers, Arizona law provides for certain warranties to be included in every contract. The most significant of those warranties, the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability, requires builders to...more

Snell & Wilmer

Can a Home Builder Disclaim Implied Warranties of Workmanship and Habitability?

Snell & Wilmer on

In a recent Arizona Court of Appeals case, Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC, 2021 WL 3204491 (7/29/2021), the Court of Appeals addressed the question whether a home builder’s attempt to disclaim implied warranties of workmanship and...more

White and Williams LLP

Massachusetts Court Clarifies Statute of Repose Trigger for Multi-Phase Construction Projects

In D’Allesandro v. Lennar Hingham Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 17-cv-12567-IT, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185874, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently discussed a case against a general contractor...more

Porter Hedges LLP

Alert: "Supreme Court Of Texas Confirms Implied Warranties Are Not Just For Consumers"

Porter Hedges LLP on

In Nghiem v. Sajib1, the Texas Supreme Court resolved a dispute amongst the Texas Courts of Appeal regarding implied warranty claims…sort of. The court primarily held that a plaintiff is not required to bring a claim for...more

Snell & Wilmer

Under Construction - September 2017

Snell & Wilmer on

Welcome to the fall 2017 edition of our Under Construction newsletter. We hope your summer has left you relaxed and refreshed to make the final push to successfully finish out the remainder of the year. In this issue, we...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

Snell & Wilmer on

On August 9th, in Sirrah Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Wunderlich, the Arizona Supreme Court settled the question about recovery of attorneys’ fees after prevailing on implied warranty claims against a residential contractor. The...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

What's in Your Warranty? A Guide to Avoiding Warranty-Related Surprises

A warranty is meant to protect a purchaser from any faults or defects in goods or services purchased. But warranties are as different as the products and services that they protect. What’s more, because courts interpret...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

The Spearin Doctrine Revisited: Penzel Construction v. Jackson R-2 School District

In a recent Missouri appellate decision, the court recognized and reaffirmed the Spearin Doctrine which provides that an owner impliedly warrants the adequacy of plans and specifications it provides to a contractor. In Penzel...more

Snell & Wilmer

Under Construction - June 2017

Snell & Wilmer on

Welcome to the summer 2017 edition of our Under Construction newsletter. In this issue, to accompany the summer heat, we highlight several hot topic items affecting the construction industry, such as the recent revisions to...more

Troutman Pepper

New Jersey Federal District Court Holds That Arbitration Clause In AIA A201-1997 Does Not Apply To Post Construction Disputes

Troutman Pepper on

Blackman & Co., Inc., v. GE Bus. Fin. Servs., Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87904 (D.N.J. July 7, 2016) - Grove Street Realty Urban Renewal, LLC (“Grove Street”) contracted with Blackman & Co., Inc. (“Blackman”) to manage...more

Troutman Pepper

Western District of Virginia Confronts Several Legal Issues That Frequently Impact Multi-Party Construction Disputes – Economic...

Troutman Pepper on

Allstate Insurance Company v. Structures Design/Build, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34349 (WD VA March 17, 2016) - This construction dispute case arises from a failed pipe connector that caused water damage to a facility...more

Polsinelli

Colorado Supreme Court to Rule on Yet Another Key Construction Defects Issue

Polsinelli on

On July 5, 2016, the Colorado Supreme Court announced it will consider the construction defects case of Forest City Stapleton, Inc., et al. v. Rogers. In this case the Colorado Court of Appeals, for the first time, imposed...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Risky Business: Implied Warranty of Design in Construction Manager at Risk Agreements

In Coghlin Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Gilbane Building Company, the Massachusetts Supreme Court explored the applicability and scope of an implied warranty regarding the sufficiency of designs and specifications in the...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Rogers v. Forest City Ruling

On Thursday, Nov. 19, 2015, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Rogers v. Forest City Stapleton, Inc. (Case No. 2015COA167), a ruling that may have lasting importance for developers, builders, contractors,...more

Polsinelli

Colorado Court of Appeals Recognizes Implied Warranty of Suitability Between Master Developer and Later Purchasers

Polsinelli on

Last week, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued an opinion recognizing for the first time that a master developer may be liable to a subsequent home purchaser under an implied warranty of suitability. Rogers v. Forest City...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide