News & Analysis as of

Medical Reimbursement Appeals

Troutman Pepper

D.C. Circuit Dismisses Appeal of Class Certification Denial Due to Lack of Standing

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently dismissed an appeal in the case of Lewis v. Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The appellants sought...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Eighth Circuit Tightens Causation Requirement for FCA Claims Involving Anti-Kickback Statute Violations, Creating Circuit Split

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

In 2010, Congress amended the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to provide that claims “resulting from” an AKS violation are “false or fraudulent” for False Claims Act (FCA) purposes. 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(g)...more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

Supreme Court Decides in Favor of 340B Hospitals Regarding Medicare Reimbursement Methodology

On June 15, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of “340B” hospitals in a notable statutory interpretation case concerning how the federal Medicare program reimburses hospitals for prescription drugs. The...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - The LHD/ERISA Advisor

The LHD/ERISA Advisor - October 2020: ERISA Plaintiff Has Statutory Standing to Bring Action to Recover Spousal Healthcare...

Plaintiff Doug Heckman participated in Nike's employee welfare benefit plan (the "Plan"), which was funded by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. ("UHC"), and included healthcare benefits. Mr. Heckman's wife was covered under the...more

K&L Gates LLP

340B Update: Appellate Court Upholds 340B Payment Reduction as CMS Proposes Further Reductions for 2021

K&L Gates LLP on

In this week’s episode, Darlene Davis, Andrew Ruskin, and Gabriel Scott discuss notable recent developments for reimbursement under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (“OPPS”) of drugs purchased under the 340B...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Delaware Court Upholds Denial Of Workers’ Compensation Benefits For Medical Marijuana Costs

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The compensability of medical marijuana costs for a workers’ compensation claim turns on an individualized inquiry of whether such treatment is reasonable and necessary, and not whether the use of medical marijuana is...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Probate & Fiduciary Litigation Newsletter: February 2020

Goulston & Storrs PC on

The Probate & Fiduciary Litigation Newsletter compiles recent Trust & Estate cases.  Brother Gets the Cat – and Not Much Else - Where the decedent left his brother his “beloved old cat” and a small sum of money, and...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Sixth Circuit Rejects MSPA and ERISA Discrimination Claims

Seeking to control healthcare costs, many group health plans have adopted amendments that lower reimbursement rates for the treatment of end-stage renal disease ("ESRD"), which requires long-term dialysis treatment or a...more

Genova Burns LLC

NJ Appellate Division Clears Haze About Workers’ Compensation Prescribed Medical Marijuana

Genova Burns LLC on

On January 13, 2020, the Appellate Division ruled that medical marijuana may provide a reasonable and necessary form of treatment in workers’ compensation cases. In Hager v. M&K Construction, the Appellate Division affirmed a...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

ERISA Preemption — The Courts of Appeal Continue to Rule As They Await Further Supreme Court Attempts To Define, Once and for All,...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Synopsis: Two Courts of Appeal reach opposite results on ERISA preemption, thus continuing the judicial quest for a definitive meaning of ERISA preemption. Stay tuned for more such decisions, and yet more Supreme Court...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Eleventh Circuit Holds Differences in Clinical Judgment Do Not Create FCA Liability for Hospice Provider

The Eleventh Circuit agreed with the trial court that the government must do more than present expert evidence that a physician’s clinical judgment was inaccurate to establish falsity under the False Claims Act. Nonetheless,...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

FCA Medical Necessity Cases May Stand on Firmer Footing After Recent Appellate Decisions

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

In recent years, healthcare providers have increasingly faced civil and criminal enforcement actions premised on the allegation that services billed to government healthcare programs were not medically necessary. As a result,...more

Burr & Forman

Escobar Materiality Requirement Wipes Out $347 Million Jury Verdict in False Claims Act Case

Burr & Forman on

In 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Universal Health Servs. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar which dealt, in part, with how the “materiality” requirement should be enforced in False Claims Act (“FCA”)...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

CMS Rolls Out Provider Appeals Settlement Efforts

This year CMS is rolling out two new programs aimed, finally, at helping to settle certain types of pending provider reimbursement appeals. The programs are the Low Volume Appeals Initiative and Settlement Conference...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Vindication! Fifth Circuit Reverses Notorious District Court Health Care Fraud Decision

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In a major victory for ERISA plans and other payors, the Fifth Circuit recently overturned a district court’s notorious decision in favor of a healthcare provider and reinstated a plan administrator’s...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide