News & Analysis as of

Motion for Summary Judgment Patent Litigation

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

“AI-Related” Chip Patents - 1.6 Billion Reasons Why Google May Have Agreed to Settle

Recent headlines have focused on the $1.6 billion damages claim and Google’s possible exposure in Singular Computing’s patent infringement lawsuit involving Google’s “AI-related” chips. $1.6 billion is certainly not chump...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2021 Decisions: John Bean Techs. Corp. v. Morris & Assocs., Inc.,...

This case was the second opinion in a patent dispute saga between two poultry processing competitors over patented poultry chilling technology. See John Bean Tech. Corp. v. Morris & Associates, Inc., 887 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir....more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2021 Decisions

[co-author: Jamie Dohopolski] Last year, the continued global COVID-19 pandemic forced American courts to largely continue the procedures set in place in 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was no...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal finds summary trial appropriate, upholds dismissal of ViiV’s action for patent infringement re: Gilead’s...

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On September 15, 2021, ViiV applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39823). The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by ViiV from a decision of the Federal Court granting...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Connolly Grants Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Indefiniteness In Patent Infringement Action

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in University of Massachusetts et al. v. L’Oréal USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 17-0868-CFC-SRF (D.Del. April 20, 2021), the Court granted Defendant L’Oréal’s...more

Knobbe Martens

Recoupment of Monetary Investment Is Not the Only Consideration for Equitable Intervening Rights

Knobbe Martens on

JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. MORRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Before, Lourie, Reyna, and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Summary: Recoupment of monetary investment is not...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court continues recent trend of granting summary judgment in appropriate patent proceedings

Smart & Biggar on

In a recent decision, Flatwork Technologies LLC v Brierley (2020 FC 997), the Federal Court granted summary judgment in favour of the Plaintiff, Flatwork Technologies, LLC (Flatwork), in respect of its patent impeachment...more

Knobbe Martens

Controlling Your Own Destiny: Patent Owner Unilaterally Moots Appeal to Preserve Favorable PTAB Determination

Knobbe Martens on

ABS GLOBAL, INC. V. CYTONOME/ST, LLC - Before Prost, Moore, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A patent owner may moot a petitioner’s appeal of an IPR final written decision of no...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of No Infringement Under Doctrine Of Equivalents

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., Civil Action No. 17-1386-LPS (D.Del. October 28, 2020), the Court, inter alia, denied Defendant’s motion for summary...more

Knobbe Martens

Natural Law and Nothing More

Knobbe Martens on

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC - Before Dyk, Moore, and Taranto. Appeal from the District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Claims directed to a law of nature, without more, may not be...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Judge Woods Zips Up Loose Ends and Readies Zipper Dispute For Trial

On July 30, 2020, U.S. District Judge Gregory H. Woods (S.D.N.Y.) ruled on a second round of summary judgment motions brought by defendant YKK Corp. and its affiliates (together, “YKK”) against plaintiffs Au New Haven, LLC...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

No IPR Estoppel Despite Purportedly “Gratuitous” Inclusion of Physical Device in Invalidity Defenses

A district court has ruled that the statutory estoppel arising from an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding does not apply to anticipation and obviousness defenses that rely significantly on a physical device. The court also...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Previous Patent Infringement Contentions and Expert Testimony May Inform the Scope of Subsequent Allegations

The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s holding that a settlement agreement between a patentee and a defendant manufacturer released additional defendants from liability because their products used components...more

Knobbe Martens

Intrinsic Evidence Establishing the Context of a Claim Term Can Limit Claim Scope

Knobbe Martens on

MCRO, INC. v. BANDAI NAMCO GAMES AMERICA - Before Reyna, Mayer and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: The scope of a claim term may be limited when...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - February 2020 #4

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., Appeal No. 2019-1080 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2020) - In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit addresses issues relating to the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Bid to Extend IPR Estoppel to Institution Denials

A federal judge in the Northern District of California recently rejected an argument that would have expanded inter partes review (IPR) estoppel seemingly beyond the plain reading of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). The plaintiff had...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - January 2020 #2

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2018-2215, et al. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020) - In this appeal from the Western District of Washington, the Federal Circuit...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Patent Infringement Suit Against Product Manufacturer Partially Doomed by Prior Suit Against Component Supplier

Chief Judge Saris of the District of Massachusetts has granted-in-part a product manufacturer’s motion seeking summary judgment of claim preclusion based on patentee’s prior assertion of the same patent against a component...more

Fish & Richardson

EDTX & NDTX Monthly Wrap-Up – November 2019

Fish & Richardson on

This post summarizes two interesting opinions out of the Eastern and Northern Districts of Texas in November 2019. Music Choice v. Stingray Dig. Grp. Inc.: What qualifies as sufficient disclosure of an expert’s...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - October 2019

Knobbe Martens on

The PTAB Cannot Approve or Deny Certificates of Correction - In Honeywell International, Inc. v. Arkema Inc., Arkema France, Appeal Nos. 2018-1151, -1153, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) does not have the...more

Smart & Biggar

Foreign Prosecution History Evidence Permitted under Section 53.1 of the Patent Act

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court has now released the first decision in which the scope of Section 53.1 of the Canadian Patent Act—the so-called “file wrapper estoppel” provision—has been considered. We recently published an IP Update...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

District Court Sheds Light on Scope of IPR Estoppel

Foley & Lardner LLP on

One area of estoppel arising from an unsuccessful AIA petition that remains poorly understood relates to prior art that is described both in a printed publication or patent and also was in use by others, such as to create...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Incomplete Hybridization: Lack of Enablement Found Where Claims Encompass Thousands of Possibilities

McDermott Will & Emery on

Finding that the number of possible embodiments that could fit within the limitations of the asserted claims numbered in the “tens of thousands,” the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the claims were not...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Check Processing Claims Bounce

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found claims directed to using data from a check to credit a merchant’s account before scanning the check to be subject matter ineligible under 35 USC § 101 as reciting an...more

Fenwick & West LLP

A Patent Application Does Not Bar a DTSA Claim Update

Fenwick & West LLP on

In Cajun Services Unlimited, LLC v. Benton Energy Service Company, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied a motion for summary judgment and held that material in a patent application can remain...more

75 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide