News & Analysis as of

Myriad › Biotechnology › Supreme Court of the United States

Myriad Genetics is a publicly-traded molecular diagnostic company headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Myriad's business model centers around isolating particular genes and determining their role in the... more +
Myriad Genetics is a publicly-traded molecular diagnostic company headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Myriad's business model centers around isolating particular genes and determining their role in the development and progression of disease. Myriad's patenting practices have elicited considerable controversy with many opponents charging that Myriad cannot rightfully patent human genes. Opponents argue that human genes are naturally occurring and not patent-eligible subject matter. Myriad counters that the practice of isolating genes is a process distinct from the genes themselves and thus, is patentable. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering the validity of Myriad's patents in AMP v. Myriad Genetics.    less -
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

A Step-by-Step Approach to Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Reform

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

There is a belief in some quarters that the most significant barrier to patent subject matter eligibility reform is an implacable opposition by companies in the high tech sector because those companies are convinced that the...more

JD Supra Perspectives

Can we patent products found in nature? It's complicated. An update on Australia's Myriad decision...

JD Supra Perspectives on

It remains to be seen if this new Myriad decision in Australia will be extended as it was in the U.S. to prevent virtually any product found in nature from being patented....more

BakerHostetler

Australian High Court Rules Gene Patents Unpatentable

BakerHostetler on

Like the United States Supreme Court, the High Court of Australia has determined that Myriad’s patents directed to purified and isolated DNA molecules encoding the BRCA genes are unpatentable. Indeed, the Australian Court...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

News from Abroad: High Court Rules Myriad's BRCA Genes Not Patentable Subject Matter in Australia

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Just over one year after the Full Federal Court of Australia unanimously upheld an earlier Federal Court decision that naturally occurring nucleic acid molecules are patentable in Australia, the High Court of Australia has...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Australia High Court Rules Against Gene Patents

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Colleagues in Australia have been spreading the bad news: The High Court of Australia followed the lead (?) of the U.S. Supreme Court and determined that Myriad cannot patent the isolated BRCA1 gene in Australia. Thanks to...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Strong Support for Sequenom’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

In Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. v. Sequenom Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2015), a Federal Circuit panel held that Sequenom Inc.’s prenatal diagnosis patent claims patent ineligible subject matter under the two-step test of Mayo...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

More Q&A from Webinar on Top Patent Law Stories of 2013

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On Tuesday, we presented a live webinar on the "Top Patent Law Stories of 2013." The webinar covered ten of the fourteen stories that made it onto Patent Docs seventh annual list of top biotech/pharma patent stories. Posts...more

Akerman LLP

Post-Myriad Strategies for Claiming Biotech Inventions in the United States

Akerman LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that genes or other naturally-occurring pieces of DNA are patent ineligible subject matter in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al. No....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

After Myriad: A Herd of Elephants in the Room

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

As we all know by now, the Supreme Court last month decided that isolated genes are not eligible for patenting. Although seemingly drawing a clear-cut distinction between DNA molecules having the same sequence as that which...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Myriad: Comparing US Law with European, Japanese and Australian Law

Ladas & Parry LLP on

The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that isolated DNA having the same sequence as naturally-occurring DNA is not patentable subject matter is inconsistent with the position of the European Patent Office and Japanese law....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Rules on Patentability of Human Genes

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Today the U.S. Supreme Court answered the question "Are human genes patentable?" The Court, in Association of Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. et al., ruled that isolated DNA is a product of nature and not...more

BakerHostetler

Patent Watch: Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

BakerHostetler on

A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Holds Isolated Naturally Occurring DNA Cannot Be Patented, Sustains Patent-Eligibility of cDNA

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On June 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in the “ACLU/Myriad” gene patenting case (formally, Association For Molecular Pathology. et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al., Supreme Court No....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Issues Decision in AMP v. Myriad -- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (2013)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In a much anticipated decision, the Supreme Court issued its opinion this morning in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. In an opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justices...more

Mintz - Trademark & Copyright Viewpoints

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Isolated Human Genes Are Unpatentable

Mintz - Trademark & Copyright Viewpoints on

Summary - On June 13, 2013 in a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 569 U.S. __ (2013) unanimously held that claims for isolated DNA sequences...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Myriad: The Court Has Spoken — Isolated DNA Is NOT Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its anxiously awaited decision in Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., No. 12-398 (U.S. June 13, 2013). The Court addressed whether an isolated...more

JD Supra Perspectives

SCOTUS: Human Genes Cannot Be Patented. Is This the End or Beginning of Genetic Research?

JD Supra Perspectives on

For a Legal Perspective on today's much-anticipated U.S. Supreme Court "Myriad" decision that naturally occuring substances are not patentable, we turned to IP attorneys writing on JD Supra...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will the Supreme Court Limit Nanotech Patents?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a case styled The Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, the Supreme Court is confronting the question of whether or not human genes are patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101. A decision is expected in the...more

JD Supra Perspectives

[Legal Perspective] Can Human Genes Be Patented?

JD Supra Perspectives on

Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that comes down to a single question: can human genes be patented?...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Briefing the Supreme Court in Myriad

Foley & Lardner LLP on

March 15, 2013 was a big deadline for patent applicants seeking to secure first-to-invent filing dates for U.S. patent applications, but April 15 will be a big day for the biotechnology industry, when the Supreme Court hears...more

Baker Donelson

Supreme Court To Hear Oral Arguments in Landmark Patent Case

Baker Donelson on

April 15 is a big day for biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and medical diagnostic companies at the Supreme Court, as justices begin a new session by hearing oral arguments in a landmark case involving the patentability of...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Is It Time for Myriad to Concede in AMP v. Myriad for the Good of the Biotechnology Industry?

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Supreme Court's grant of certiorari over the question "Are human genes patentable" had raised for many the specter of an uninformed generalist court rendering a decision containing dicta that would negatively affect...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide