News & Analysis as of

Patent Invalidity Supreme Court of Canada

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds invalidity of Lilly’s CIALIS patent extending to "physiologically acceptable salt"

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed an appeal by Lilly from a decision of the Federal Court (see our previous article) which had granted a motion for summary trial brought by Teva, Pharmascience, Laboratoire Riva,...more

Smart & Biggar

2022 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

Below are highlights from the Rx IP’s team’s 2022 updates (see also our Top 10 Rx IP Update Reads of 2022): Contents: 1. Patent decisions on the merits 2. PMNOC Regulations: Fifth-year anniversary of major amendments,...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada denies Amgen leave to appeal decision invalidating its filgrastim patent

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, Amgen sought leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal (2020 FCA 188) affirming Justice Southcott’s decision that the relevant claims of its filgrastim (NEUPOGEN) patent were invalid...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada leave applications – January 2021

Smart & Biggar on

Supreme Court denies leave in infliximab patent infringement action - On January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to Janssen and Kennedy Trust (Docket No. 39099) with respect to the Federal Court of...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - March 2019

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court finds invalidity allegations relating to patent for metformin formulations not justified - On March 8, 2019, Justice Fothergill granted Valeant Canada’s application for an order prohibiting the Minister of...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - November 2018

Smart & Biggar on

In This Issue: Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due to “promise doctrine” - In an action by Apotex for compensation from...more

Smart & Biggar

Update on AstraZeneca SCC and developments on “overpromising” under grounds other than utility

Smart & Biggar on

SCC Update. On October 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Apotex’s motion to amend the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment in AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 (reported here, relating to...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Procure and Enforce—Canada's Highest Court Hands IP Owners Two Wins in Three Days

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Supreme Court of Canada has issued two IP decisions in the span of three days—both of which spell victory for IP rights-holders. One case confirms the availability of a novel form of worldwide injunction where a non-party...more

Smart & Biggar

RX IP Update - January 2017

Smart & Biggar on

Apotex’s Infringement of AstraZeneca’s Omeprazole Formulation Patent Upheld - As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision released on January 12, 2017 (2017 FCA 9), has affirmed the...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Supreme Court Hearing May Resolve Critical Questions in Canadian Patent Law

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently granted AstraZeneca Canada Inc. et al. (AstraZeneca) leave to appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision upholding the invalidity of AstraZeneca’s Nexium patent. This appeal...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

More Than a Pinky Promise: Recent Developments to the Promise Doctrine in Patent Law

Don’t want your patent invalidated? Then you should diligently vet any promissory language in that patent because, as the following cases illustrate, such language raises significant risks of patent invalidation on the basis...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide