News & Analysis as of

Patents Certiorari

Holland & Knight LLP

Section 101 Patent Eligibility Roundup: A Senate Hearing, a New Cert Petition and More

Holland & Knight LLP on

The Senate on Jan. 23, 2024, held a hearing to consider the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA), the proposed legislation introduced by Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Tillis noted that though...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefing in Amgen v. Sanofi: The Rest of the Story - Part III

The Supreme Court's consideration of the standards for satisfying the enablement provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) has been occasioned for the first time in over a century by the Court's granting certiorari in Amgen v....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefing in Amgen v. Sanofi: The Rest of the Story

The Supreme Court's consideration of the standards for satisfying the enablement provisions of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) has been occasioned for the first time in over a century by the Court's granting certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi. ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Supreme Court grapples with patent enablement

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Amgen v. Sanofi yesterday in an extended session with arguments from the parties and the U.S. government. The Justices showed a great deal of interest, albeit with some difficulty,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Another Group of Law Professors File Amicus Brief in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi is the first time in almost a hundred years that the Court has deigned to consider sufficiency of disclosure decisions, in this case enablement under 35...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

U.S. Government Files Amicus Brief in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi is the first time in almost a hundred years that the Court has deigned to consider sufficiency of disclosure decisions, in this case enablement under 35...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

AbbVie Files Amicus Brief in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi is the first time in almost a hundred years that the Court has deigned to consider sufficiency of disclosure decisions, in this case enablement under 35...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

GlaxoSmithKline Files Amicus Brief in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi is the first time in almost a hundred years that the Court has deigned to consider sufficiency of disclosure decisions, in this case enablement under 35...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Patent Law Academics File Amicus Brief in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi is the first time in almost a hundred years that the Court has deigned to consider sufficiency of disclosure decisions, in this case enablement under 35...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi to Decide Enablement Question

Snell & Wilmer on

On November 4, 2022, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi, No. 21-757, to review “[w]hether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art to make...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Intellectual Property Law: Looking Forward to 2023

With the continuing advancements of cutting-edge technologies — such as genome editing (CRISPR) and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) — U.S. courts will have a full docket of challenging IP cases throughout 2023. Below are some of...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Amgen v. Sanofi on Question of Enablement

Saul Ewing LLP on

​On November 4, 2022, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi, No. 21-757, agreeing to review, “whether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art...more

Kilpatrick

Supreme Court Grants Amgen’s Petition for Certiorari to Reconsider Enablement of Genus Claims

Kilpatrick on

Last week, the Supreme Court granted Amgen’s petition for certiorari to reconsider the enablement requirement for genus claims. The Supreme Court will review whether the Federal Circuit panel in Amgen v. Sanofi improperly...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court to Consider Enablement Requirement

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Supreme Court of the United States agreed to consider how much a patent must disclose in order to meet the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 112. Amgen Inc., et al. v. Sanofi, et al., Case No. 21-757 (Supr. Ct....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi: High Court Will Tackle Proper Enablement Standard

The Supreme Court on Friday, Nov. 3, granted Amgen’s petition for certiorari on the second of the Questions Presented in its petition...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - November 2022

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC, Appeal Nos 2021-1555, -1795 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2022) - Our Case of the Week is ostensibly a case about whether a patent owner has standing to sue when that patent holder has...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court to Address What it Means to Have an Enabling Disclosure

BakerHostetler on

The Supreme Court has granted Amgen’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, agreeing to address what it means to provide an enabling disclosure. In particular, Amgen asked the Court to address...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi

High Court Will Tackle Proper Enablement Standard - Constituting something of a surprise, the Supreme Court on Friday, November 3rd granted Amgen's petition for certiorari on the second of the Questions Presented in its...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Grants Cert to Address Enablement in Amgen Case

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​The U.S. Supreme Court agreed today to review “whether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art to ‘make and use’ the claimed invention, 35 U.S.C. § 112,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Hold That Generic, Please: Supreme Court Grants Emergency Request to Stay Federal Circuit’s Mandate

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a rare action by the Supreme Court of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts granted Novartis’s emergency request for a stay of a mandate from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which had found a Novartis...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Patent Eligibility Law: Status Quo for Now, But Is Change on the Horizon?

Fenwick & West LLP on

There have been no substantial changes to patent eligibility law or practice under 35 U.S.C. § 101 since the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s last guidance in October 2019. With legislative reform in Congress stalled,...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Important 2020 Patent Law Decisions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Harris Beach PLLC on

Whether you are pursuing patents on your new technology, thinking about bringing patent infringement litigation or defending patent infringement claims in court, knowing the important developments in patent law will help you...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions: Introduction

Last year, the global COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for American courts. By making several changes, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was able to largely continue its operations....more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions

[co-author: Kathleen Wills] Last year, the global COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for American courts. By making several changes, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was able to...more

Holland & Knight LLP

A "Bitterly Divided" Federal Circuit Declines to Stay Decision Invalidating Car Driveshaft Patent

Holland & Knight LLP on

Despite one concurring judge's belief in a "fair probability" that the U.S. Supreme Court would grant certiorari and reverse an order invalidating American Axle's driveshaft patent for purportedly claiming natural law, the...more

130 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide