News & Analysis as of

Punitive Damages Mesothelioma

Goldberg Segalla

Oregon Jury Renders $260M Verdict for Plaintiff in Talc Trial

Goldberg Segalla on

Fourth Judicial District Circuit Court for Mulnomah County, Oregon (Portland) In this matter, plaintiff Kyung Lee claimed that she developed mesothelioma from her use of Johnson & Johnson baby powder, which she alleges was...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket/Packing Manufacturer Prevails after Jury Trial

Goldberg Segalla on

Court:  United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Decedent Arnold L. Pritt was diagnosed with singular mesothelioma, epithelioid type in September 2019. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos during his...more

Goldberg Segalla

Court Denies Railway Company’s Renewed Motion for Spoliation; Agrees to Bifurcate Trial

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division In connection to defendant Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company’s ongoing litigation in Libby, Montana (covered extensively by the...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion to Dismiss Damages under Maritime Law Granted in Part

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Central District of California- In this action, the plaintiffs filed suit on behalf of the decedent, William Banks, in Los Angeles County Superior Court and thereafter...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion for Summary Judgment of Gasket and Packing Manufacturer Granted in Part and Denied in Part

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division - Plaintiffs Chloyde Pelton and Shirley Pelton sued Defendant John Crane Inc. for negligence, willful and wanton conduct, and...more

Goldberg Segalla

$107 Million Asbestos Verdict Set Aside after Findings of Misconduct

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Civil Division - In this asbestos action, a California state court set aside a $107 million verdict against defendants Union Carbide Corp., Elementis Chemicals...more

Goldberg Segalla

Talc Defendant Denied Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - In this action, defendant Vanderbilt Materials LLC moved for summary judgment of the plaintiffs’ claim that plaintiff Roberto Gonzalez was exposed to asbestos in...more

Goldberg Segalla

NJ Appellate Court Reverses $223.8 J&J Talc Verdict on Causation Grounds

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division - Johnson & Johnson has successfully appealed a $223.8 judgment against it following a trial involving allegations of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder in...more

Goldberg Segalla

Talc Supplier’s Motion for Summary Judgment Denied as to Causation, Granted as to Punitive Damages

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, Erie County - In this asbestos matter, plaintiffs claimed that decedent, Jeffrey Campise, was exposed to asbestos through consumer talcum powder products. Plaintiffs filed suit against a...more

Goldberg Segalla

Boiler Manufacturer Directed to Appear for Punitive Damages Deposition

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department - In this asbestos action, Defendant Burnham (“Burnham”) moved to vacate the NYCAL Special Master’s ruling directing Burnham to appear for a deposition with...more

Goldberg Segalla

Automotive Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Fails as Issues of Fact Remain on Causation and Punitive Damages

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, Erie County, October 6, 2022 - In this asbestos action, Plaintiff Joseph Skrzynski alleged that he developed malignant mesothelioma as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos from brakes...more

Harris Beach PLLC

California Appellate Court Provides Relief to Defendants by Reining in Misapplication of Punitive Damages

Harris Beach PLLC on

Mass tort defendants frequently defend lawsuits in venues like Los Angeles County, California, which are favored by plaintiff firms due to their plaintiff-favorable law and propensity for large verdicts. In a recent decision...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

California Court of Appeal Reverses $3,000,000 Punitive Damages Award

On July 5, 2022, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District (Los Angeles), issued an opinion in Willie McNeal, Jr. v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. (B313472, July 5, 2022) reversing $3,000,000 in punitive...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 6.4.2019 | Top Story: DOJ Mulling Google Antitrust Action

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The DOJ is considering joining its European counterparts in targeting Google for potential antitrust violations focused on Google’s “advertising practices and influence in the online advertising industry,” possibly including...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

AC36912 - Whitney v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc. Plaintiff entered into an employment and stock purchase agreement with the owner of the company, that provided if he were terminated without cause before the end of five...more

Mayer Brown

California Court Of Appeal Bends Over Backwards To Uphold Substantial Punitive Award In Asbestos Case

Mayer Brown on

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires procedural fairness in state trials, but that principle seems absent from a recent California Court of Appeal decision upholding a judgment against Kaiser Gypsum...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide