News & Analysis as of

Qui Tam Medical Necessity

K&L Gates LLP

Qui Tam Quarterly: Strategies for Avoiding the "Battle of the Experts" in False Claims Act Cases Based on Medical Necessity

K&L Gates LLP on

Medical necessity cases continue to be a focal point for False Claims Act (FCA) investigations and lawsuits. With this focus comes an age-old problem for health care providers and entities defending these actions: the...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Ninth Circuit Joins Several Others in Finding that Lack of Medical Necessity Claims Can Proceed Under the False Claims Act

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently allowed a False Claims Act (FCA) case based on an alleged lack of medical necessity to proceed, rejecting the lower court's decision that subjective medical opinions about the...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Landmark AseraCare Case Finally Ends in Settlement

As many of our readers know, the AseraCare case was closely watched over the last several years because of its significance to efforts by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to allege that submission of claims for services...more

Morgan Lewis - Health Law Scan

$1 Million Settlement Reached in AseraCare FCA Case

In an action especially significant to hospice providers but also other healthcare providers regarding the determinations of medical necessity for Medicare billing purposes, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and AseraCare...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 13, 2019, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in the False Claims Act Case of Winter v. Gardens (18-55020). The government, as an amicus in the case, carried the bulk of the argument on behalf of the plaintiff...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

The Eleventh Circuit Remands AseraCare, But Affirms High Hurdle for Proving Falsity

In a highly anticipated opinion in the AseraCare case, issued on September 9, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s holding that “a clinical judgment of terminal illness warranting hospice...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Eleventh Circuit Rules in AseraCare Case that Disagreements in Clinical Judgment, Without Objective Falsity, Do Not Prove Fraud...

On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its long-awaited and closely watched decision in United States v. AseraCare Inc.. The court ruled that a claim cannot be deemed false under the False Claims...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Independent Laboratory Settles Medical Necessity Allegations

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a $1.99 million False Claims Act (FCA) settlement with GenomeDx Biosciences Corp. (“GenomeDx”), a laboratory headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia with operations in...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Tenth Circuit Revives FCA Claim Based on Alleged Lack of Medical Necessity

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a significant decision, finding that a physician’s medical judgment about the medical necessity of heart procedures can be “false or fraudulent” under the federal False Claims Act...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

A LOOK BACK... A LOOK AHEAD - While the uncertainty associated with legislative efforts to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) dominated most of the headlines for the healthcare industry last year,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

D.C. District Court Clarifies Standard for Laboratory Determination of Medical Necessity

This past June, a federal district court in the District of Columbia made headlines when it declined to dismiss an action brought by a qui tam plaintiff (“Relator”) against defendant Boston Heart Diagnostics (“Boston Heart”),...more

Jones Day

Court Overreaches in Requiring Medical Necessity Determination by Labs

Jones Day on

On June 9, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion to dismiss brought by a laboratory in U.S. ex rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp., 2017 WL 2533341. Part of the grounds for...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide