News & Analysis as of

Qui Tam Real Party in Interest

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court Grants Government Broad Dismissal Rights in Qui Tam Cases

Stevens & Lee on

The U.S. Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision written by Justice Kagan, held on June 16 that the United States (“Government”), having initially chosen not to intervene in a False Claims Act (“FCA”) qui tam case, but having...more

Epstein Becker & Green

The United States Is the FCA Party in Interest, Not the Relator – SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

It should come as no surprise to constitutionalists, practitioners under the Federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§3729–3733) (FCA), and auditors of the oral argument in the case that the Supreme Court has held that the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Self-Disclosure and the FCA Statute of Limitations

Holland & Knight LLP on

Most practitioners are aware that the statute of limitations under the False Claims Act (FCA) is six years after the date on which the violation is committed. 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(1). That is, unless the FCA’s tolling...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Jury Verdict in Declined Civil FCA Action Need Not Bar Criminal Prosecution for Same Conduct

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act allow private citizens to file FCA claims on behalf of the government. The government may elect to intervene in the action—or it may not. The United States District Court for...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide