News & Analysis as of

Reasonably Continuous Exercise of Diligence Standard

McDermott Will & Emery

Wave Goodbye: Arguments Incorporated by Reference Are Waived

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s patentability determination, finding that the patent challenger waived an argument it attempted to incorporate by reference to another...more

Stevens & Lee

Evading Transaction Roadblocks: Strategies for Common Late-Stage Dealbreakers

Stevens & Lee on

After completing the arduous task of preparing to sell a business and agreeing to the terms in principle for a transaction in which a business owner will sell his or her “life’s work,” selling business owners (“Seller” or...more

Cozen O'Connor

Will The Standard of Liability Under The 60-Day Repayment Rule Change?

Cozen O'Connor on

At the end of last year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed changes to the so-called 60-day repayment rule. The proposed changes include eliminating the current “reasonable diligence” standard that...more

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Ohio Supreme Court Further Clarifies ‘Reasonable Diligence’ Standard under the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act

On March 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Fonzi v. Brown and Fonzi v. Miller, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-901, discussing the level of due diligence required of a surface owner to provide notice to a...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Supreme Court Adopts “Reasonable Diligence” Standard For Surface Owners Seeking To Abandon Severed Mineral Interests Under...

Roetzel & Andress on

On December 17, 2020, in yet another significant case involving severed mineral interests, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its opinion in Gerrity v. Chervenak, 2020-Ohio-6705. In a unanimous decision to affirm, the Court...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - May 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Reasonably Continuous Diligence Is Not Negated If an Inventor Works On Improvements or Evaluates Alternatives to the Claimed Invention - In ATI Technologies ULC v. IANCU, Appeal Nos. 2016-2222, -2406, -2608, the Federal...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit says the PTAB used the Wrong Shade of Diligence

Jones Day on

As the sayings go, diligence is the mother of good luck, and necessity is the mother of invention. But for patents that fall under the pre-AIA, first-to-invent, system, proving diligence can be a necessity for invention. In...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Reasonably Continuous Diligence to Reduction to Practice is Enough

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained that diligence towards reduction to practice may be established by a showing of reasonably continuous activity. ATI Techs. ULC v. Iancu, Case Nos. 2016-2222, -2406,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Federal Circuit Holds that PTAB Applied “Too Rigid a Standard” In Determining Whether Inventor Was Diligent in Reducing Invention...

The Federal Circuit reversed an inter partes review (IPR) decision holding that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) incorrectly applied the standard for an inventor to prove diligence in reducing the invention to...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide