News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Fourth Amendment

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 2, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in four cases today: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 24-568: This case involves an Illinois law that required mail-in ballots to be counted as long...more

Gray Reed

Balancing Privacy and Tax Enforcement in the Digital Age

Gray Reed on

The Internal Revenue Service was aware of significant underreporting of cryptocurrency on tax returns and used one of its investigative tools (i.e., a John Doe summons) in 2016 to seek financial information on thousands of...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Rejects "Moment-of-Threat" Rule in Section 1983 Excessive Force Suit

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In Barnes v. Felix, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that courts evaluating Fourth Amendment excessive-force claims in Section 1983 lawsuits against law enforcement officers must consider the “totality of the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The most anticipated event at the U.S. Supreme Court today was the oral argument in the birthright citizenship case....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 15, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision today: Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239: This criminal procedure case concerns the proper scope of analysis for Fourth Amendment excessive force claims....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - October 4, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in 15 cases: Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Solutions, No. 23-971: This case concerns the intersection between Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, which...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Not the Day We Are Waiting For - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

With a significant mass of cases left to decide and only a few weeks to issue the opinions, the U.S. Supreme Court has reduced the backlog by four yesterday. None of them, however, resolves the future of Chevron deference or...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 20, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions today: Moore v. United States, No. 22-800: This case concerns the constitutionality of the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (“MRT”) included in the 2017 Tax Cuts and...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court:  Innocent Owners of Forfeited Personal Property Must Wait

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On May 9, in Culley et al. v. Marshall, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not require a preliminary hearing in civil forfeiture cases involving personal property for claimants to raise the “innocent...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 8, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Egbert v. Boule, No. 21-147: In this case, Robert Boule sued a border patrol agent arguing the agent violated his Fourth and First Amendment rights by using excessive force during a search and retaliating against Boule when...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Court Refuses to Extend Bivens to Excessive Force and Retaliation Claims: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Notwithstanding the fact that, as we approach the end of the term, the Court still had 30 cases to decide as of Wednesday morning, June 8, the day’s count has only been reduced by one. So, expect a flurry of cases with the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Egbert v. Boule

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 8, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Egbert v. Boule, No. 21-147, declining to recognize a cause of action for damages against a federal border agent for either a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim or a First...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Thompson v. Clark

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On April 4, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Thompson v. Clark, No. 20-659, holding that a plaintiff who brings a Fourth Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for malicious prosecution must show that the underlying...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April 4, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision: Thompson v. Clark, No. 20-659: In 2014, police received a report that petitioner Larry Thompson was sexually abusing his newborn baby. When police...more

Baker Donelson

A Victory for Qualified Immunity. A Trend to Continue?

Baker Donelson on

Events from recent years related to alleged police misconduct raised major questions surrounding the protections afforded by qualified immunity to police officers in excessive force claims. Two recent Supreme Court decisions...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Significant Criminal Cases from the Supreme Court’s 2020-2021 Term

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

The Supreme Court recently concluded the 2020-2021 term with its decision in the controversial voting rights case of Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. Although Brnovich and other high-profile cases like Fulton v....more

Law Matters

On Caniglia v Strom and Community Caretaking: Q&A with Shay Dvoretzky and Emily Kennedy of Skadden

Law Matters on

In a 9-0 opinion by Justice Thomas, the Supreme Court held that the “community caretaking” exception does not extend to the home, narrowing police powers to search homes without a warrant and repudiating the First Circuit’s...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Supreme Court Rejects Community Caretaking Doctrine to Authorize Warrantless Search of Home to Seize Firearms

Rumberger | Kirk on

The 21st Century law enforcement officer serves a variety of public service functions, only some of which involve the enforcement of criminal laws. From some of those non-criminal public service roles, the courts have...more

Poyner Spruill LLP

Torres v. Madrid (New Excessive Force Opinion from SCOTUS)

Poyner Spruill LLP on

In a 5-3 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Torres v. Madrid that a woman who was shot while fleeing from police officers was “seized,” even though she remained at large. ...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Drone Operators Beware….Michigan Appellate Court Opines On Privacy

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a new decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals has held that when it comes to privacy and aerial surveillance, a landowner has a greatly enhanced expectation of privacy when unmanned aircraft are involved. The decision,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - March 25, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist., No. 19-368; Ford Motor Co. v. Bandemer, No. 19-369: In two separate products liability actions, petitioner Ford Motor Company challenged the Montana and Minnesota State courts’...more

BakerHostetler

2020 Supreme Court Update

BakerHostetler on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October term started earlier this month, and promises to be an unprecedented session. How is the Court responding to the pandemic and adapting to a virtual environment? Which cases should you be...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Hernandez et al. v. Mesa

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On February 25, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Hernandez et al. v. Mesa, No. 17-1678, declining to extend a judicially created damages remedy for a constitutional violation by a federal employee, a U.S. Border Patrol agent...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - December 18, 2019

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the following cases: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, No. 19-267; St. James School v. Biel, No. 19-348: Whether the First Amendment’s...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Mitchell v. Wisconsin

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 27, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. Wisconsin, No. 18-6210, holding that the exigent-circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement almost always permits a blood test without a...more

132 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide