News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Patent-Eligible Subject Matter › Patent Infringement

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | August 2024

Knobbe Martens on

Specify the Steps of Information Manipulation or Lose under § 101 - In Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd. Appeal No. 22-2216, the Federal Circuit held that patent claims that merely recite result-orientated, functional...more

AEON Law

Patent Poetry: Federal Circuit Confirms Background Check Software Not Patentable

AEON Law on

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s decision that the claims of a patent for software that manages pre-employment background checks weren’t patent-eligible. The case is In Miller Mendel, Inc. v. City of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Patent Claims Directed to a Graphical User Interface as Ineligible Subject Matter Under 35...

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of patent claims directed to a graphical user interface that seeks to enhance how search results are displayed to a user. The court agreed that the claims are...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court Dismissed Claim Directed to Natural Speech Processing in a Vehicle-Mounted System as Patent Ineligible

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

The Eastern District of Virginia recently dismissed a patent infringement claim, holding that the asserted claim directed to natural speech processing is patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, because it fails the Alice...more

AEON Law

Split Decision on Patents for Restricting Access to Computer Files

AEON Law on

A Federal Circuit judge, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware, granted-in-part and denied-in-part a Rule 12(c) motion by the defendant for judgment based on patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The case...more

Weintraub Tobin

Federal Circuit Continues to Strike Down Patents as Abstract Ideas

Weintraub Tobin on

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has again relied on the Supreme Court’s Alice case to invalidate patents on the grounds that they are directed to an abstract idea. Realtime Data LLC v. Fortinet Inc. ( Fed. Cir. 8/2/2023)...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

What Patent Bills Would Mean for Infringement Litigation

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

Two bills recently introduced in Congress could significantly affect the current patent litigation landscape. The bipartisan bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - July 2023 #4

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2022-2217, 2023-1021 (Fed. Cir. July 24, 2023) In the Federal Circuit’s only precedential patent case this week, the Court considered questions...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Web IP Ruling Illustrates Ways To Clear Hurdles To Eligibility

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2014 Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International ruling, patentees attempting to enforce their patents in the software arts have encountered a more significant hurdle for patent eligibility that has...more

AEON Law

Patent Poetry: Federal Circuit Finds Plausible Allegations of Inventive Concept in Google Patent Dispute

AEON Law on

The Federal Circuit has reversed a New York court’s grant of a motion by Google to dismiss a patent infringement case against the company. The court found that the plaintiff had plausibly alleged an inventive concept in its...more

Weintraub Tobin

Alice is Alive and Well!

Weintraub Tobin on

Not everything is patentable. First, only inventions are patentable. Second, only certain inventions are patentable. Four types of inventions are patentable: articles of manufacture, machines, processes, and compositions of...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Important 2020 Patent Law Decisions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Harris Beach PLLC on

Whether you are pursuing patents on your new technology, thinking about bringing patent infringement litigation or defending patent infringement claims in court, knowing the important developments in patent law will help you...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

USPTO Addresses Filing Delays Caused by the Impact of COVID-19

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

While much of the focus of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act relates to economic stimulus, the Act also granted temporary authorization to the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

A Step-by-Step Approach to Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Reform

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

There is a belief in some quarters that the most significant barrier to patent subject matter eligibility reform is an implacable opposition by companies in the high tech sector because those companies are convinced that the...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Won’t Take Up Patent Eligibility for Medical Diagnostics

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

The cloud of uncertainty over patent eligibility of patents for medical diagnostic methods remains. On Monday, the Supreme Court declined the opportunity to revisit patent eligibility under its two-step Mayo test when it...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Denies Review In Three Section 101 Cases

Troutman Pepper on

On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in the following cases...more

White & Case LLP

Design patents: a growing trend in the hardware space

White & Case LLP on

Design patents–why now? We are in 2019. Aesthetics matter. Products that look good sell better. Hardware companies are investing increasing amounts of resources into design teams that create sleek and modern products that...more

Hogan Lovells

Standard Essential Patent Update – August 2018

Hogan Lovells on

In the August 2018 edition of Hogan Lovells’ Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Update, we report on recent news and case decisions from China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This bi-monthly newsletter...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. + Germany Patent Update – July 2018

Hogan Lovells on

The prominent state of patent litigation in the United States and Germany is due not only to the size of its markets, but also to a recent increase in hearings before the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Patent...more

Vedder Price

Overcoming Early Alice Rejections in Litigation

Vedder Price on

In 2014, the United States Supreme Court in a landmark decision in the field of Patent Law (Alice Corp. v. CLS Int’l) invalidated software patents related to mitigating settlement risk. Relying on the now-infamous Section...more

Jones Day

Key Patent Decisions of 2017

Jones Day on

In another noteworthy year for patent law, the U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit issued a number of decisions that altered the patent landscape, including four Supreme Court decisions. The topics of the key cases...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - December 2017

Knobbe Martens on

Claims Directed to Methods for Streaming Audiovisual Data Held Unpatentable Under § 101 - In Two-Way Media Ltd v. Comcast Cable Communications, Appeal Nos. 2016-2531, 2016-2532, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit, With Some Significant Cases from 2016

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - July 2017

Knobbe Martens on

District Court Abused Discretion in Not Finding Case Exceptional - In Rothschild Connected Devices v. Guardian Protection Services, Appeal No. 2016-2521, the Federal Circuit held that a district court abused its discretion...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Prism Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

An Obviousness Rejection in Patent-Eligibility Clothing? - In Mayo v. Prometheus, the Supreme Court wrote "[w]e recognize that, in evaluating the significance of additional steps, the § 101 patent-eligibility inquiry and,...more

88 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide