News & Analysis as of

Section 101 Patent Litigation Dietary Supplements

DLA Piper

Feeble § 101 Litigation Position Results in Significant Award of Fees and Costs

DLA Piper on

The District Court of Delaware recently confirmed an award of $9.15 million in attorney’s fees and costs to defendant Elysium Health, Inc. (Elysium), resulting from what it determined to be insubstantial litigation positions...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Upholds Method Of Treatment Claims Under Vanda And Distinguishes Mayo

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Natural Alternatives Internat'l v. Creative Compounds, LLC, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court decision that held the asserted claims invalid under 35 USC § 101 at the pleadings stage. I previously wrote about...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility of Dietary Supplements

The Federal Circuit weighed in on patent subject matter eligibility again last week, finding certain amino-acid containing dietary supplements, and related methods of use, to be patent eligible. In Natural Alternatives Int’l...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Vacates Natural Product Challenge Of Dietary Supplement Claims

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Natural Alternatives Internat’l v. Creative Compounds, LLC, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court decision that held the asserted claims invalid under 35 USC § 101 at the pleadings stage. The claims at issue...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide