News & Analysis as of

Section 101 Patent Litigation Software Developers

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Dancing with Abstract Ideas: Patent Eligibility in 2025

In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l, establishing a now-infamous two-step, judicially-imposed test for patent subject-matter eligibility that narrowed the broad statutory eligibility...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The EFF is Patently Wrong

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is at it again, gaslighting the public in its ongoing crusade against patents.  While the EFF does perform some commendable work, mostly in the areas of individual privacy rights, its...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

On the Patent Eligibility of Graphical User Interfaces: Part I

The evolution of graphical user interfaces parallels the evolution of computing technology itself.  As computers grow more powerful and sophisticated, so does their ability to display cutting-edge representations of...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Federal Circuit: Complexity Does Not Necessarily Impart Section 101 Patentability

Holland & Knight LLP on

Earlier this week, the Federal Circuit reviewed a PTAB affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims directed to a computer-conducted method of "assigning and managing the rights to receive taxes when amounts are disbursed...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Federal Circuit: Commercial Success is Not Relevant to Alice Analysis

Holland & Knight LLP on

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rejected all pending claims of Mr. Greenstein’s patent application, which was directed to adjusting the amount a person saves and choosing investments with the goal of saving enough...more

Holland & Knight LLP

E.D. North Carolina Axes Patent Directed to Teaching Guitar

Holland & Knight LLP on

Rocksmith sued Yousician Oy, alleging infringement of its patent entitled "interactive guitar game." The patent discloses software for learning to play the guitar and provides an "effective way to provide interactive method...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - March 2019 #4

SRI Int’l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., Appeal No. 2017-2223 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 20, 2019) - In a decision following trial, the Federal Circuit addressed the issue of the eligibility of patent claims directed to technology meant...more

Knobbe Martens

Sri International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from District of Delaware. Summary: Under step one of Alice, a claim is not directed to an abstract idea when it recites a specific technique to...more

Blank Rome LLP

Out of Wonderland from Diehr to Aatrix: 3 Steps to Overcoming 101 Rejections

Blank Rome LLP on

Post-Alice, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) is aggressively rejecting software claims under the Alice two-part test, the parameters of which many examiners are still trying to understand. Not...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit: Rare Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility of Software Claims

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., the Federal Circuit offered rare guidance on the contours of patent eligible subject matter under § 101. The two related asserted patents, both entitled...more

K&L Gates LLP

Federal Circuit Continues to Clarify Subject Matter Eligibility for Software Patents

K&L Gates LLP on

Many software-related and business method-related patents have been invalidated for being directed to “abstract ideas.” On January 10, 2018, in Finjan, Inc., v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the...more

A&O Shearman

Shearman & Sterling’s Digest on Federal Circuit Jurisprudence Concerning the “Abstract Idea” Exception to 35 U.S.C. § 101

A&O Shearman on

At first glance, the development of Section 101 jurisprudence appears chaotic. The Supreme Court captured several different kinds of problems in Alice and its earlier patentable-subject-matter opinions, and the Federal...more

Fish & Richardson

Amdocs v. Openet: Federal Circuit Will Take Case-by-Case, Common-Law Approach to “Abstract Idea” Determinations Under Alice

Fish & Richardson on

The Federal Circuit in a 2-1 decision upheld four software patents against a patent-eligibility challenge, finding that the patents do not claim an “abstract idea.” The decision, Amdocs (Israel) Ltd. v. Openet Telecom Inc. et...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Federal Circuit is In Sync with Patent’s Validity Under Section 101

The Federal Circuit overturned a District Court ruling that a patent directed to automated lip synchronization and manipulation of animated characters’ facial expressions was invalid under Section 101 as being an abstract...more

Fenwick & West LLP

McRo: Preemption Matters After All

Fenwick & West LLP on

The Federal Circuit has released its long-awaited opinion in McRo v. Bandai, reversing the lower court’s decision that the claims were ineligible subject matter. McRo’s invention in U.S. 6,307,576 was a method used in 3D...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Software Patents Are Still Very Useful Despite Alice, But Are Business Method Patents?

Patents generally describe new inventions in terms of a unique structure, function, or combination of structure and function. Those patents that focus on functions of computers or computer-implemented functionality are often...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide