News & Analysis as of

Statutory Interpretation › Appeals › False Claims Act (FCA)

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

A Constitutional Perspective on False Claims Act Penalties: District Court Finds That Penalties Conflict With Constitution’s...

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

In a potential watershed decision issued on February 26, 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled, in U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, that the civil penalties...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

For Whom the Bell Tolls: Does Wisconsin Bell Indicate Waning Support for Invalidating the FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions?

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

In the summer of 2023, Justice Thomas suggested in a dissenting opinion in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources that Article II of the Constitution might not permit a qui tam relator to sue in the name of the...more

McCarter & English, LLP

Federal Courts Decide on FCA Claims Actions

McCarter & English, LLP on

There are still several unsettled legal issues regarding the standards applicable to a False Claims Act (FCA) claim, such as the standard to prove causation when an FCA claim is based on a violation of the Anti-Kickback...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

First Circuit Decision Raises Bar on Anti-Kickback Statute-Premised Liability Under the False Claims Act

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC on

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently joined the Sixth Circuit (2023) and Eighth Circuit (2022) in holding that the term “resulting from” in the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) (as amended in...more

Goodwin

First Circuit Adopts Defense-Friendly “But-For” Causation Standard for AKS-Predicated FCA Claims

Goodwin on

In a unanimous panel opinion filed on February 18, 2025, the First Circuit held that False Claims Act cases predicated on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), require proof that alleged kickbacks were the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Anti-Kickback Statute Premised False Claims Cases: The “But For” Causation Standard Finds Support from First Circuit

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It’s now 3–1, with the First Circuit (2025) aligning with the Sixth (2023) and Eighth (2022) Circuits finding the meaning of the words “resulting from” — as used in a 2010 amendment to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS)...more

ArentFox Schiff

DC Circuit Narrowly Interprets False Claims Act’s “Government-Action Bar”

ArentFox Schiff on

On May 17, 2022, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit issued an opinion in a False Claims Act suit, narrowly interpreting the so-called “government-action bar.” The government-action bar, 31 USC § 3730(e)(3), forecloses...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Third Circuit Perpetuates Tuomey’s Controversial Stark Law “Volume or Value” Standard

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit endorsed two controversial interpretations of the Stark Law’s “volume or value” standard, known as the correlation theory and the practice “loss” theory in U.S. ex rel. J. William...more

Polsinelli

Tenth Circuit Confirms that Compliance Employees Must Satisfy Heavier Burden to Obtain FCA Whistleblower Protection

Polsinelli on

On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in United State ex rel. Reed v. KeyPoint Government Solutions affirmed the dismissal of an employee’s False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower retaliation claim....more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide