News & Analysis as of

Subject Matter Jurisdiction Federal Jurisdiction

Dechert LLP

Dechert Re:Torts - Issue 16

Dechert LLP on

Supreme Court to Resolve Availability of RICO Claims to Personal Injury Plaintiffs - On April 29, 2024, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, No. 23-365, 2024 WL 1839091 (U.S. Apr. 29,...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Probate Exception to Federal Jurisdiction – From Woitovich (Part 1) to Bulgari (Part 2)

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

For trust and estate litigators, the federal court experience invariably begins – and sometimes ends — with an analysis of the probate exception to federal diversity jurisdiction.  Two recent Southern District cases examine...more

Troutman Pepper

EDVA Judge Rules Supplemental Jurisdiction Is Not a Basis for Removal

Troutman Pepper on

A recent EDVA decision reinforced the point that removal to federal court must be based on the existence of either federal question or diversity jurisdiction, but not supplemental jurisdiction....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: Removal Requirements

This week, the Court holds that it may sua sponte question the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) in a removed case where a defendant’s notice of removal alleged the...more

Downey Brand LLP

Hey, That’s Also My Turf! Contract Claims Involving Estates May Be Litigated in Federal Court

Downey Brand LLP on

Exactly where a court’s jurisdiction begins and ends is a question that has long irked our judicial system. One muddle is the extent to which federal courts, as opposed to state courts, can decide disputes involving a...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Federal Courts Have Subject-Matter Jurisdiction over Criminal Prosecutions Against Foreign Sovereign...

The United States Supreme Court has rejected arguments made by Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. (“Halkbank”) that, as a majority state-owned bank and thus an agency or instrumentality of the Republic of Türkiye, it enjoys immunity...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Supreme Court Limits Federal Court Jurisdiction to Vacate or Confirm Arbitration Awards

In an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Badgerow v. Walters that federal courts may not examine the substance of arbitration disputes to establish federal question jurisdiction under Sections 9...more

K&L Gates LLP

Look At Me, Not Through Me: Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction for Post-Arbitration Award Petitions

K&L Gates LLP on

On 31 March 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Badgerow v. Walters limited federal subject matter jurisdiction over post-arbitration award petitions under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) §§ 9 and 10. After years of...more

Porter Hedges LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Arbitration

Porter Hedges LLP on

On March 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued an important decision regarding federal courts’ subject matter jurisdiction to confirm, vacate, or modify arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction over Arbitration Awards

Last week in Badgerow v. Walters, the United States Supreme Court held in an 8-1 decision that under the Federal Arbitration Act, a federal court cannot consider an underlying dispute to determine whether it has federal...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court’s New Arbitration Ruling: Limits Federal Jurisdiction For Confirming or Challenging Arbitration Awards Under the FAA

On March 31, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Badgerow v. Walters, No 20-1143, addressing when federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to confirm, modify, or vacate arbitration...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Through the Looking Glass: Courts Cannot “Look Through” Arbitration Motion to Establish Jurisdiction

McGlinchey Stafford on

In a nearly unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Badgerow v. Walters that a district court cannot “look through” to the underlying controversy in order to support jurisdiction to decide a motion...more

BakerHostetler

The Vote is In, FAA Sections 9 And 10 Do Not Provide “Look-Through” Jurisdiction to Confirm or Modify Arbitral Awards

BakerHostetler on

Our prior blog articles predicted that the outcome in Badgerow v. Walters, No. 20-1143, might turn on whether the plain text of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) or its purposes would prevail. See our June 16 and Nov. 9, 2021...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Federal Jurisdiction Limited When Confirming or Setting Aside Domestic Arbitration Awards

Holland & Knight LLP on

In a recent decision involving arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal courts do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate a domestic arbitration award under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal...more

Gray Reed

Recent Supreme Court Case Provides Possible Pre-Assessment Judicial Review for Onerous Penalties

Gray Reed on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service may have significantly expanded taxpayers’ ability to obtain immediate injunctive relief against onerous tax reporting requirement....more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Allows Challenge to IRS Rule to Go Forward Despite Anti-Injunction Act

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The ruling provides a new avenue for parties to bring pre-enforcement challenges to IRS rules and regulations. Key Points: ..In CIC Services v. IRS, the US Supreme Court allowed a pre-enforcement challenge to an IRS...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Pave Way for Future IRS Lawsuits

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently rendered a unanimous opinion holding that the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) did not block a lawsuit brought by CIC Services against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), delivering an important...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court Opens Door to APA Challenge of Overreaching IRS Information Reporting Regime

In CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service, a unanimous US Supreme Court allowed CIC, a tax advisor, to proceed with a pre-enforcement challenge to the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) “reportable transaction” regime....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Supreme Court puts IRS on notice [2016-66] in CIC Services, LLC - The Anti-Injunction Act has its limits

On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court held that the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), section 7421(a) of the Code, does not preclude a pre-enforcement challenge to an IRS notice enforced through civil and criminal penalties. The AIA...more

Alston & Bird

Taxpayers Can Strike First: Supreme Court Allows Pre-Enforcement Challenges to Certain IRS Regulatory Actions

Alston & Bird on

Our Federal Tax Group examines a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that could give taxpayers greater leeway to challenge IRS regulatory schemes before the IRS takes enforcement action....more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Rules Tax Penalty Does Not Bar Pre-Enforcement Regulatory Challenge

Jones Day on

The Supreme Court held that a company may bring a pre-enforcement challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") to an IRS reporting requirement backed by a tax penalty. On May 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court...more

Freeman Law

Supreme Court Hands Tax Advisor Big Win in CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

Freeman Law on

Federal tax cases against the IRS can be difficult. Even procedurally so. Under the pay-first, litigate-later rule, taxpayers are generally required, prior to filing suit against the United States: (1) to full pay the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

U.S. Circuit Courts Split on Abstention Doctrine in Dissolution Cases

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In 1994, in Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, covering New York, Connecticut and Vermont, closed federal courthouse doors in those states to petitioners seeking judicial...more

Burr & Forman

Fifth Circuit Finds Jurisdiction Over Post-Award Proceedings Under FAA

Burr & Forman on

While the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not provide federal subject matter jurisdiction, federal courts may nevertheless have jurisdiction over proceedings to compel arbitration if the underlying claim is “predicated...more

Proskauer - Whistleblower Defense

Minnesota Federal Court Rejects Employer’s Attempt to Litigate State-Law Whistleblower Claim in Federal Forum

On March 11, 2019, a federal court in Minnesota rejected an employer’s attempt to litigate a plaintiff’s state-law whistleblower claim in a federal forum, ruling it was insufficient that the plaintiff alleged violations of...more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide