News & Analysis as of

Terminal Disclaimer Patent Term Adjustment Patent Litigation

Foley & Lardner LLP

Leveraging USPTO Delays To Maximize Patent Term

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Before the USPTO was subject to a hiring freeze, it assumed it would onboard 400 new examiners between fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2026, and still predicted an increase in the backlog of unexamined patent applications....more

Knobbe Martens

A Terminal Disclaimer Is Not an Escape Hatch

Knobbe Martens on

IN RE CELLECT, LLC - Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Obviousness-type double patenting analyses for patents with Patent Term Adjustments are based on the...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Dangers in the U.S.

The Federal Circuit’s decision in Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma Ltd. introduced even more confusion in an already confusing area of the law – namely obviousness-type double patenting. Obviousness-type double patenting...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Patent Term Adjustment Versus Double Patenting

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Magna Electronics, Inc. v. TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., No. 1:12-cv-654; 1:13-cv-324 (Dec. 10, 2015), Judge Maloney of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan granted TRW’s motion for partial summary...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide