News & Analysis as of

Termination for Convenience Contract Disputes

Troutman Pepper

Ohio Court Reforms Construction Contract to Correct “Manifest Absurdity” in Termination for Convenience Term

Troutman Pepper on

Hanuman Chalisa, LLC v. BoMar Contr., Inc., 2022-Ohio-1111, 187 N.E.3d 1108 (Ct. App.) - Hanuman Chalisa LLC (owner) contracted BoMar Contracting, Inc. (BoMar) to construct a hotel in Columbus, OH. The contract consisted...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Perfecting A CDA Claim: Sage Advice For The Sum Certain Requirement

Husch Blackwell LLP on

If a dispute arises on a federal contract, the Contract Disputes Act requires a contractor to submit a written demand seeking as a matter of right a “sum certain” to the contracting officer as part of the claims process. What...more

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP

[Webinar] Government Contracting Fundamentals Series: Avoiding Terminations for Default, and the Impact of T4Cs and T4Ds - July...

Obermayer is excited to introduce its new “GovCon Examiner Live” webinar series, your resource for the fundamentals in government contracting and small business procurement. Over the course of 12 months, our experienced...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

[Webinar] Considerations for Companies Entering the Federal Contracting Space - June 17th, 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm ET

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

HKA and Vinson & Elkins are pleased to present a webinar on “Considerations For Companies Entering the Federal Contracting Space.” Vinson & Elkins partner, Dan Graham, along with HKA Partners Greg Bingham and Mike LaCorte...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Termination for Default – the Government's Burden - Construction and Procurement Law News, Q3 2019

In Alutiiq Manufacturing Contractors, LLC v. United States, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Government had improperly terminated a construction contract for default and ordered that the default termination be...more

Troutman Pepper

Massachusetts Supreme Court Declares That State Contract Principles, Not Federal Precedent, Govern The Interpretation Of...

Troutman Pepper on

A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transport Auth., 479 Mass. 419 (May 2, 2018) - In a case of first impression, the Massachusetts Supreme Court held that general contract principles, and not federal case law,...more

Bowditch & Dewey

Interpreting Termination for Convenience Clauses: A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. MBTA

Bowditch & Dewey on

In A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued an unambiguous decision on May 2, 2018, that a termination for convenience clause in...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

An Instructive Warning to Contractors of the Need to Understand CDA Requirements

PilieroMazza PLLC on

A few months back, my colleague, Michelle Litteken, wrote a blog post titled “Don’t Get Lost Filing and Prosecuting CDA Claims.” She discussed a decision, Securiforce International America, LLC v. United States, in which the...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Don’t Get Lost Filing and Prosecuting CDA Claims

PilieroMazza PLLC on

Although the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”) is intended to provide an efficient way for contractors to resolve disputes with the Government, contractors often encounter difficulties when submitting and prosecuting CDA claims....more

Troutman Pepper

Washington State Court Upholds Termination For Convenience Clause in Subcontract – Partial Performance Provides Adequate...

Troutman Pepper on

SAK & Assocs. v. Ferguson Constr., Inc., 189 Wn. App. 405 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015) - Ferguson Construction, Inc. (“General Contractor”) entered into a fixed sum contract (the “Subcontract”) with SAK & Associates...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide