News & Analysis as of

Third-Party Beneficiaries Wage and Hour

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Courts Provide Employers More Reasons to Review Their Arbitration Agreements

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

A pair of recent California Court of Appeal decisions serve as yet another reminder to employers of the difficulties that they potentially face when enforcing arbitration agreements in California and, as a result, the...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: May 2020

Payne & Fears on

Betancourt v. OS Rest. Servs., LLC, No. B293625, 2020 WL 2570839 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2020) - Summary: A plaintiff is not entitled to recover penalties for waiting time and wage statement violations based on claims of...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: February 2019

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key California employment law cases involve reporting time pay and potential liability of payroll companies for wage and hour violations. ...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Payroll Company Not Liable Under Third Party Beneficiary Doctrine

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On February 7, 2019, the California Supreme Court determined that an employee cannot sue a payroll company for breach of contract under the third party beneficiary doctrine, and that it is inappropriate to impose a tort duty...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Calif. Justices Stress Employers' Wage Statement Duties

On Feb. 7, 2019, the California Supreme Court struck a decisive victory in favor of payroll companies, issuing a unanimous opinion that an employee is not a third-party beneficiary of the contract between her employer and its...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

California Supreme Court Announces a Win for Payroll Outsourcing Industry

Last week, the California State Supreme Court struck a decisive victory in favor of payroll companies, issuing a unanimous opinion that an employee is not a third-party beneficiary of the contract between her employer and its...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California Supreme Court Holds that Employee Cannot Bring Wage Claims Against Payroll Service Provider

• The California Supreme Court recently held that an employee could not pursue contract and tort claims against a payroll service provider for unpaid wages. • The Court found that (1) an employee was not a “third-party...more

Payne & Fears

California Supreme Court Limits Liability for Payroll Service Providers

Payne & Fears on

On February 7, 2019, the California Supreme Court unanimously held in Goonewardene v. ADP, Inc., S238941 that a payroll service provider cannot be held liable for errors it makes in issuing paychecks to workers of companies...more

Carlton Fields

Ninth Circuit Finds That Party Was A Third-Party Beneficiary Of Arbitration Agreement, And Affirms Order Compelling Arbitration Of...

Carlton Fields on

Three delivery drivers sued a transportation broker for failure to pay overtime and minimum wages, failure to provide rest and meal breaks, failure to timely pay wages upon termination, and willful refusal to pay wages on...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide