News & Analysis as of

Travelers Property Casualty Co. Denial of Insurance Coverage

Cozen O'Connor

Ninth Circuit Holds COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses Require Direct Physical Damage To The Property

Cozen O'Connor on

In March 2020, Mudpie Inc.—a San Francisco children’s store—ceased operations when California Governor Gavin Newsom ordered all “non-essential” businesses to close due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of the shut-down,...more

Carlton Fields

The Insurer’s Howler, or How Travelers Proved Its Insured’s Case

Carlton Fields on

What happens when an insurer presents evidence at trial that supports the insured’s case? Answer: The evidence can be used to sustain the jury verdict for the insured-plaintiff. That is the lesson learned by Travelers in the...more

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

Policy Buyback Settlement Cannot Extinguish Coverage for Former Subsidiary

On July 11, 2019, in Magnetek, Inc. v. The Travelers Indem. Co., Case No. 17 C 3173, Judge Robert Gettleman of the Northern District of Illinois issued an important decision preserving insurance coverage for a former...more

Troutman Pepper

New Case May Signal Greater Likelihood That Insurers Are on the Hook for Coverage in Phishing Attacks

Troutman Pepper on

A new Sixth Circuit decision may signal an emerging trend on whether insurers must cover claims made by policyholders who fall victim to phishing scams....more

Nossaman LLP

Travelers Fails to Pull a Rabbit out of its Hat and Must Defend its Insured

Nossaman LLP on

In a recent federal court decision out of Colorado, Travelers failed to convince the Court that it had no duty to defend its insured based on its IP exclusion (barring coverage for patent infringement claims). Travelers’...more

Rumberger | Kirk

What's a Coverage Defense? 11th Circuit Addresses Coverage Defenses under the Florida Claims Administration Statute

Rumberger | Kirk on

When coverage is at issue, the interplay between a policy’s language and an insurer’s duties under the Claims Administration Statute, Florida Statute Section 627.426, becomes a key factor in claims handling for insurers. In...more

Carlton Fields

A Stitch in Time Saves … An Insured From Incurring Non-Covered Defense Costs

Carlton Fields on

Timely notice is typically a condition precedent to coverage under an insurance contract, though many states require an insurer to demonstrate prejudice before denying coverage solely based on a failure to comply with a...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Eleventh Circuit: Insurer Not Required to Reimburse Pre-Tender Defense Costs

McGuireWoods LLP on

It may seem obvious that policyholder defendants should immediately notify their liability insurance carrier whenever they are faced with potentially covered litigation. Among other things, policyholders want the benefit of...more

Cozen O'Connor

Are Consent Judgments in Colorado Dead? Colorado Strictly Enforces “No Voluntary Payments” Clause

Cozen O'Connor on

On Monday, April 25, 2016, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. v. Stresscon Co., No. 13SC815 (Colo. Apr. 25, 2016), holding that an insurer does not need to show prejudice to enforce a...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Bad Faith Sentinel - September 2015

Saul Ewing LLP on

Kennedy v. Allstate, No. 15-2221 (E.D. Pa. July 8, 2015). District Court recognizes possibility that insurance adjusters owe a duty of care to insureds that would be breached by failing to conduct a reasonable...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide