News & Analysis as of

Treatment Method Patents Patent Infringement Patents

Fish & Richardson

Middle District of North Carolina Finds Public Interest Favors Granting Preliminary Injunction

Fish & Richardson on

On December 27, 2023, Chief Judge Catherine Eagles of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina granted a motion for preliminary injunction by Natera Inc. enjoining NeoGenomics Laboratories Inc. from...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Why Method of Treatment Patents for Repurposed Drugs Are Worth the Investment

Scientists, clinicians, and other investigators are discovering new uses for drugs previously known for different medical indications. Such “drug repurposing” (also called drug repositioning, profiling, or re-tasking) has...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Federal Circuit Holds That Claims of a Patent Asserted During a Patent Term Extension Are Not Infringed by the Carboxylic Acid...

Recently, the Federal Circuit issued its holding in a case dealing with asserting claims of an extended patent covering administration of dimethyl fumarate formulations to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Dimethyl fumarate...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Gensetix, Inc. v. Board of Regents of the University of Texas System (Fed. Cir. 2020)

In a conundrum worthy of a law school civil procedure examination, plaintiff Gensetix found itself apparently with no remedy for infringement by Baylor College of Medicine, Diakonos Research Ltd., and William Decker of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court: Prosecution History Context Defeats Written Description Requirement

The District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia recently found method of treatment claims directed to treating a specific disease at a specific dose invalid for lack of written description based on the context...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court dismisses Biogen’s actions under PMNOC Regulations against Taro and Pharmascience re: FAMPYRA

Smart & Biggar on

On May 15, 2020, Manson J. of the Federal Court dismissed two actions brought by Biogen under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations) alleging infringement of Patent No. 2,562,277 (277...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Pre-Issuance, Industry-Standard Monitoring and Copying of a Product Does Not Support a Finding of Willful Infringement of Method...

Despite evidence that defendants monitored plaintiffs’ product development and attempted to match its dosing intervals, the District Court of Delaware found no willful infringement because that activity took place before the...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal remands REMICADE new use patent decision on anticipation and obviousness

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Janssen’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39099). On January 12, 2021, the Trial Judge issued the reconsideration decision, again finding the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Federal Circuit Reverses District Court Anticipation Decision Combining Two Prior Art References

The Federal Circuit reversed a decision from the District Court for the District of Delaware invalidating three patents on anticipation grounds, finding the district court improperly relied on disclosures from multiple...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

A Step-by-Step Approach to Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Reform

There is a belief in some quarters that the most significant barrier to patent subject matter eligibility reform is an implacable opposition by companies in the high tech sector because those companies are convinced that the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Broad Genus of HCV Compounds Wasn’t Enabled or Described

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a case relating to compounds for the treatment of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) for lack of enablement...more

Knobbe Martens

Patent Claim Reciting a List “Consisting Essentially of” Is Indefinite Where the Basic and Novel Property of the Invention Is...

Knobbe Martens on

HZNP Medicines LLC, Horizon Pharma USA, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. Before Prost, Newman, and Reyna.  Appeal from the District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary: Claims using “consisting...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Concrete Controversy if There Are No Claims

McDermott Will & Emery on

In reversing a district court decision as to whether a validity issue remained justiciable after the challenged claims were disclaimed, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained that the patent owner’s...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Eliminate Medical Treatment Patents? An Effort Approaches the Supreme Court

Will the Supreme Court’s banning of methods of medical diagnosis from patenting in Mayo v. Prometheus be extended to patents for medical treatments? Since Mayo some have argued that some methods of medical treatment should...more

Knobbe Martens

Broad Description in Specification Defeats Patent Owner’s Bid for Narrow Construction

Knobbe Martens on

BTG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC - Before Wallach, Moore, and Chen. Consolidated appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. ...more

Dechert LLP

Federal Circuit Panel Describes the Doctrine of Equivalents as Applying “Only in Exceptional Cases”

Dechert LLP on

In a patent owner’s declaratory judgment action under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) a Federal Circuit panel in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1551 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2019) narrowly...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - April 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Just Because Something May Result From a Prior Art Teaching Does Not Make it Inherent in that Teaching - In Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1599, the Federal Circuit clarified that the mere...more

Knobbe Martens

Grunenthal GMBH v. Alkem Laboratories Limited

Knobbe Martens on

Before Judges Reyna, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary: There may be no reasonable expectation of success in producing a specific polymorph of a compound when...more

Knobbe Martens

ENDO Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Before Wallach, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Claims directed to a specific method of treatment for specific patients using a specific compound...more

Knobbe Martens

Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from District of Delaware. Summary: A district court’s construction of a claim term that is contrary to the plain language of the claims and usage of the...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - May 2018

Knobbe Martens on

Priority Claims Cannot Be Incorporated by Reference - In Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited, Appeal Nos. 2016-2707 and 2016-2708, the Federal Circuit held that when a patent for a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Angiomax Patents Limited To Example

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In The Medicines Co. v. Mylan, Inc., the Federal Circuit construed composition claims of two Angiomax patents as requiring the recited “batches” to be made by a specific “efficient mixing” process illustrated in one of the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Finds Infringement Under Akamai Of Two-Step Method Of Treatment

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision finding infringement under Akamai of a two-step method of treatment when the prescribing information for the...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Divided Infringement Challenges for Personalized Medicine

Fenwick & West LLP on

On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last month held in Akamai Tech. Inc. v. Limelight Networks Inc. that “direct infringement liability of a method claim under 35 U.S.C....more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide