News & Analysis as of

Voluntary Dismissals

Fox Rothschild LLP

Influencer Aesthetic Dispute Resolves by Voluntarily Dismissal

Fox Rothschild LLP on

What has become known as the “Sad Beige Lawsuit” ended on May 28, 2025, when influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford (“Gifford”) voluntarily dismissed all claims against fellow influencer Alyssa Sheil (“Sheil”) with prejudice. The...more

K&L Gates LLP

Uneven Pour: FTC's Robinson-Patman Enforcement Sees Mixed Results as Pepsi Case Goes Flat and Southern Glazer's Orders Another...

K&L Gates LLP on

Since the publication of “Rum and Coke: The FTC Targets Soft Drinks and Alcohol in the Revival of Robinson-Patman Act Enforcement–What’s Next?”, new developments have continued to shape the enforcement landscape of the...more

Cozen O'Connor

Georgia’s 2025 Tort Reform: What Businesses, Insurers, and Litigators Need to Know

Cozen O'Connor on

In recent years, Georgia has earned a prominent—and troubling—spot on the American Tort Reform Association’s annual “Judicial Hellholes” list, drawing national attention to the state’s increasingly unpredictable and...more

Vedder Price

New Jersey SLAPPs Back: New Jersey Court of Appeals Eradicates Anti-SLAPP Loophole

Vedder Price on

On May 29, 2025, the New Jersey Court of Appeals reversed dismissal in Satz v. Starr, No. A-2785-23, 2025 WL 1522032 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 29, 2025), holding that the plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of his claims did...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Baltimore voluntarily dismisses case seeking to prevent transfer of CFPB funds outside the Bureau

On May 29, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore filed a notice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to voluntarily dismiss their case against the CFPB and Russell Vought. As previously covered by...more

Fisher Phillips

SCOTUS Ruling Expands Path for Plaintiffs to Revive Dismissed Lawsuits: What Employers Need to Know

Fisher Phillips on

A new Supreme Court decision just made it easier for employees to revive lawsuits they voluntarily dismissed – in some cases, even after the statute of limitations has expired. In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - February 26, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., No. 23-900: The Court held that in awarding the “defendant’s profits” to the prevailing plaintiff in a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Amid Uncertainty, Government Contractors Should Document, Notify, and Escalate Claims

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Government contractors working for the Department of Education (DE), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and other agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Consumer Financial...more

McDermott Will & Emery

A Lesson in Judicial Principles: No Dismissal After Decision

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a patent owner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal following the Federal Circuit’s decision to vacate and remand the case to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board but...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Rules Property Owner Can Recover Attorney Fees When Eminent Domain Case Is Dismissed by the Taking Authority

Roetzel & Andress on

In the case of N. Ridgeville v. Zilka, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 23CA012047, 2024-Ohio-2468, Ohio’s Ninth District Court of Appeals addressed the ability of a property owner in an eminent domain action to recover attorney fees...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Go Home: No “Prevailing Party” Status After Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that a copyright holder’s voluntary dismissal of its claims did not render the defendant a prevailing party entitled to attorneys’ fees under...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Beyond Serious Prejudice: The BCCA Establishes a New Test to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution

Bennett Jones LLP on

Not infrequently, a plaintiff loses interest in pursuing litigation without being willing to discontinue or settle, or starts litigation to preserve a limitation period without being committed to pursue it. Rule 22-7(7) of...more

Jenner & Block

“Must’ve Never Met Her”: Luke Combs & Personal Service Under Illinois Law

Jenner & Block on

On December 13, 2023, Variety reported that Luke Combs stated he was “sick to [his] stomach” to learn he won a $250K judgment in Illinois federal court against a Florida woman who earned $380, selling 18 handmade Luke...more

BakerHostetler

Voluntary Dismissal as DOJ Contemplates Future of Criminal No-Poach Cases

BakerHostetler on

As we previously wrote, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) April 2023 loss in United States v. Patel, its fourth in a criminal no-poach case, cast a pall over the agency’s enforcement efforts. The following month, the DOJ...more

Gray Reed

Tax Court Confirms Taxpayer’s Right to Dismiss Their Own Lawsuit

Gray Reed on

An interesting recent Tax Court decision seems to indicate that taxpayers have clear autonomy with regards to judicial review as well as retracting judicial review of “seriously delinquent tax debt.” ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

SDNY Decision Denies Motion to Redact FCA Complaint: By Filing, Relator Took Calculated Risk of the Negative Consequences of...

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The recent settlement of a False Claims Act case afforded SDNY Judge Ronnie Abrams the opportunity to address the standard for redacting a qui tam Relator’s FCA complaint.  Judge Abrams decided that Relator Devin English had...more

McGlinchey Stafford

When does a plaintiff have a right to a jury trial under the CSPA? - McGlinchey Commercial Law Bulletin

McGlinchey Stafford on

Fraudulent Transfer Act Allan v. Allan, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga Nos. 110177, 110179, 2022-Ohio-1488- In this appeal, the Eighth Appellate District reversed the trial court’s decision under the Fraudulent Transfer Act case to...more

Dickinson Wright

Effect of a Stipulated Dismissal “Without Prejudice” on Appellate Jurisdiction

Dickinson Wright on

On occasion, a plaintiff faced with the dismissal of one or more, but not all, of its claims may wish to pursue an immediate appeal without losing the ability to pursue its remaining claims later on. A similar situation...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending January 14, 2022

Carlton Fields on

Dismissal / Fees & Costs: While not an adjudication on the merits, a voluntary dismissal generally entitles a defendant to attorneys' fees as the prevailing party - Catamaran B.Y., Inc. v. Giordano, No. 3D21-369 (Fla. 3d DCA...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Bringing a Case to Arbitration Should be Easier Following Recent Ninth Circuit Decision

Court Raises the Bar on Appeals Following Voluntary Dismissal - A plaintiff may not avoid arbitration and manufacture appellate jurisdiction simply by voluntarily dismissing his claims, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Federal Procedure: Dismissing a Single Party in Multiparty Litigation — Check Your Jurisdiction!

In multiparty lawsuits, situations can arise where dismissal of a single party—either on the plaintiff or defendant side—is sought. For example, a plaintiff in a multi-plaintiff suit may tire of the litigation. Or a spouse...more

K&L Gates LLP

Voluntary Dismissal in North Carolina: A Primer

K&L Gates LLP on

North Carolina Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss its claims without prejudice any time before resting its case. This is in contrast to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the rules...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Ninth Circuit Holds Plaintiffs Not Entitled To Equitable Restitution Under UCL/CLRA If Adequate Remedy At Law Is Available

Earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit held that state law cannot expand or confine a federal court’s power to issue equitable restitution because federal courts are bound by traditional equitable principles, which require,...more

Jones Day

American Rule Applied to PTAB Attorney’s Fees

Jones Day on

In Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Almirall, LLC, the Federal Circuit recently found 35 U.S.C. § 285 did not authorize the Court awarding attorney’s fees for conduct occurring at the PTAB. No. 2020-1106, 2020 WL 2961939, at *2...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Does my release bar a future claim?

McGlinchey Stafford on

The Bullet Point: An Ohio Commercial Law Bulletin May 20, 2020 In this appeal, the Eleventh Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s decision finding that the defendants did not waive the defense of lack of personal...more

111 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide