Ann Fort

Ann Fort

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

The Finite Life of a Patent Upheld: No Royalties After Expiration

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6 to 3 ruling citing stare decisis, upheld the half-century rule against royalty payments accruing after expiration of a patent. The Court’s decision in Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC is a...more

6/24/2015 - Brulotte Expiration Date Kimble v Marvel Enterprises License Agreements Patent Expiration Patent Infringement Patent Royalties Patents Royalties SCOTUS Settlement Agreements Stare Decisis

“Use It or Lose It”: Service Mark Registration Canceled When Application Supported Only by Advertising

On March 2, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its first-ever ruling addressing use requirements for registering service marks. The court held that offering a service, without the actual rendering...more

3/6/2015 - Advertising Appeals Lanham Act Registration Service Marks Use in Commerce

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Juries Should Decide Trademark Tacking

In its first substantive trademark ruling in more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held on January 21, in Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank et al., No. 13-1211, that tacking – which is whether two trademarks...more

1/26/2015 - Hana Financial v Hana Bank Jury Questions Likelihood of Confusion SCOTUS Tacking Trademarks

De Novo Review of Claim Construction No Longer the De Facto Standard

On January 20, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, rejected the de novo review standard applied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit when reviewing all claim construction...more

1/22/2015 - Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Intellectual Property Litigation Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Prescription Drugs SCOTUS Standard of Review Teva Pharmaceuticals Teva v Sandoz

What Do You Mean? Nautilus Ruling Holds That a Patent Claim Must Convey with Reasonable Certainty the Scope of the Invention

On June 2, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held in Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc. that a patent claim may be found indefinite if it fails to convey the scope of the invention “with reasonable certainty” to a person...more

6/4/2014 - Claim Construction Indefiniteness Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

It Takes One to Infringe: Akamai Ruling Holds That Induced Infringement Requires Direct Infringement by a Single Party

On June 2, 2014, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. that direct infringement by a single party is a prerequisite to a finding of induced infringement. In doing so, the...more

6/3/2014 - Akamai Technologies Appeals Direct Infringement En Banc Review Induced Infringement Limelight Networks Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Legal Alert: UPDATE: The Hare Loses Steam – Patent Litigation Reform Law Unlikely This Year

Efforts by the U.S. Senate to pass an alternative to the Innovation Act, which aims to reform abusive patent litigation, have stalled. Sen. Patrick Leahy, who is leading the effort, has announced that his committee is tabling...more

5/26/2014 - Apple Attorney's Fees DuPont Fee-Shifting Statutes Ford Motor FTC General Electric Highmark Highmark v. Allcare IBM Innovation Act Medtronics Microsoft Octane Fitness v. ICON Patent Litigation Patent Reform Patent Trolls Patents Pfizer USPTO

High Octane Patent Litigation? Supreme Court Relaxes Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees While Increasing Deference on Appeal

In twin unanimous opinions issued yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected long-standing Federal Circuit rules governing the award of attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party in patent litigation, and appellate review of...more

4/30/2014 - Attorney's Fees Brooks Furniture Highmark v. Allcare Octane Fitness v. ICON Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Legal Alert: Better Luck Next Time? Trial Judge Rejects RICO Claim Against Innovatio IP Ventures, Wireless Hot Spot NPE

For those interested in the unique legal issues presented by the licensing and litigation efforts of non-practicing entities, the Chicago-based litigation involving non-practicing entity Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, has...more

2/8/2013 - Breach of Contract False Statements Licenses Non-Practicing Entities Patents RICO

9 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×