More Nails in the Coffin of Third Party Payor Actions by Dechert LLP on 5/16/2012 In a pair of precedential opinions, the Third Circuit affirmed today the dismissal - for lack of standing- of the Intron off-label promotion RICO class action....more
Another Homework Failure By Plaintiffs by Dechert LLP on 5/16/2012 Yesterday, we blogged about a case where plaintiff failed to do even the most basic investigation to identify the product at issue before filing suit. She was hoping her case would survive with some vague pleadings in the...more
Extent of Non-Debtor Parent Exposure Under Channeling Injunctions by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on 5/15/2012 Originally published in New York Law Journal - Volume 247—NO. 85, Thursday, May 3, 2012. On April 10, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in In re Quigley issued an opinion adopting a narrow...more
Product Identification Problems at the Pleading Stage by Dechert LLP on 5/14/2012 As another work-week starts, we thought we’d talk about beginnings – in particular, beginnings to adversarial contests. They almost always begin after the adversaries and the stakes have been identified. In the NHL, for...more
The Pain Pump Litigation Pumps Out another Good Decision by Dechert LLP on 5/10/2012 To us, sometimes plaintiffs’ lawyers sound like Cary Grant. You know, “Duty, Duty, Duty.” (By the way, “Judy, Judy, Judy” is a famous misquote. Cary Grant never once said it in a movie. But he did say it here – at the...more
Oh, Canada! by Dechert LLP on 5/10/2012 We’ve blogged before, occasionally, about drug/device developments north of the border. Most of these developments have involved class action practice, where Canadian law is considerably more liberal than the corresponding...more
NJ in Mainstream on Generic Preemption by Dechert LLP on 5/9/2012 We can't say much about it because of Dechert's involvement in the Reglan/metoclopramide litigation, but Judge Higbee has ruled on on generic preemption under Mensing. There are two opinions. The first, In re Reglan...more
MDL Transfer May Precede Resolution Of Jurisdiction by Dechert LLP on 5/9/2012 Plaintiffs try all sorts of funny business to defeat federal jurisdiction – fraudulent joinder, fraudulent misjoinder, jurisdictional amount – you name it, they’ll tinker with it. Defendants for their part, do what they can...more
A Double Dose of Preemption by Dechert LLP on 5/9/2012 In medical device cases, preemption will hunt you down. In Hinkel v. St. Jude Medical, S.C. Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56322 (E.D. La. April 23, 2012), the plaintiff survived removal and discovery only to be caught by...more
More Thoughts On Bartlett by Dechert LLP on 5/7/2012 Our initial post about Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 1522004 (1st Cir. May 2, 2012), was more or less a crie de coeur over what we saw as an essentially absurd result: that while a simple...more
Bartlett - Take It Up by Dechert LLP on 5/3/2012 The First Circuit decided Bartlett v. v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., No. 10-2277, slip op. (1st Cir. May 2, 2012) today - suggesting that it is the worst court of appeals in the country for defendants in prescription...more
More of the Same (But That’s A Good Thing) by Dechert LLP on 5/2/2012 We feel like we post on Mensing at least once a week and we have our quickly growing scorecard to back us up. It is not that surprising really, considering the vast number of cases that were stayed awaiting the Supreme...more
Another Win For Removal Before Service by Dechert LLP on 5/2/2012 We’ve learned of another win for removal before service in our local federal court, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In Boyer v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. No. 12-739, slip op. (E.D. Pa. April 25, 2011), the case...more
An Agency "Warning Letter" Does Not a Lawsuit Make: Sometimes a "Warning Letter" Is Really Just a Warning by Sedgwick LLP on 5/2/2012 Unfortunately, the number of consumer class action complaints brought against consumer product manufacturers under state consumer protection and/or false advertising law statutes continues to rise. This increase can be traced...more
Ninth Circuit to Washington Supreme Court: "Have It Your Way" by Sedgwick LLP on 5/2/2012 It's a Whopper of a case. Following Burger King's alleged service of a "spit burger," the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has certified the following question to the Washington Supreme Court: Does the Washington Product...more