Should FTC Protect Gamers Against Unhappy Endings? by Ifrah Law - Strategic Defense in Federal... on 5/23/2012 Whether you or not you are an avid gamer, you have probably realized that a significant segment of the general population takes gaming quite seriously. Probably a little too seriously sometimes. It seems that the ending...more
Archer Daniels Midland Price-Fixing Video from “Fair Fight in the Marketplace” by Howard Ullman on 5/21/2012 I recently stumbled upon this YouTube video from “Fair Fight in the Marketplace.” This segment shows the real story of the Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) price-fixing case, the basis for the movie “The Informant!“, and...more
Burma/Myanmar: The Suspension of EU Sanctions “A New Chapter in Trade and Investment” by Dechert LLP on 5/18/2012 The European Council on the 14 May adopted Regulation (EU) No 409/2012 that will give full legal effect to the suspension of EU sanctions against Burma/Myanmar. EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy...more
Alaska Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Unfair Trade Practices Liability for Businesses’ Representations Concerning Their Goods by Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on 5/18/2012 On March 30, 2012, the Alaska Supreme Court significantly expanded the scope of Alaska’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”) in a manner that will increase the risk of liability for businesses that make representations about...more
Shape-up or Ship-out: FTC Sends Tough Message to Marketers of Toning Shoes But Fails to Clarify Murky Standard by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright &... on 5/17/2012 After much hype on Twitter regarding an action against a “major marketer of consumer goods,” the Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has settled with Skechers USA, Inc. over allegedly deceptive claims that the...more
FTC Holder Rule opinion may guide CFPB by Ballard Spahr LLP on 5/17/2012 On May 3, the Federal Trade Commission issued an advisory opinion interpretating its Holder Rule (officially titled the Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Preservation of Consumers’ Claims and Defenses). The Holder Rule...more
Healthcare Legal News - May 16, 2012 • Volume 2, Number 4 by Dickinson Wright on 5/16/2012 In this issue: - Private Civil Enforcement Actions Increasing: The Ameritox vs. Millennium Lawsuit By L. Pahl Zinn, and Christian G. Ohanian As healthcare and antitrust enforcement by governmental agencies...more
Court Refuses to Dismiss Antitrust Claims in Apple E-Book Case by Howard Ullman on 5/16/2012 Today (May 15), the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.) refused to dismiss the class plaintiffs’ antitrust claims against Apple and the e-book sellers. See In re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, Case No....more
Using Federal Antitrust Law To Void Class Action Waivers by Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP on 5/15/2012 Originally published in Competition Law360 on May 15, 2012. Last year, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the so-called “collective arbitration waivers” (also...more
REGULATORY: Global Competition Law: Pakistan’s Competition Commission grants Leniency in Electrical Products Cartel by Suzanne Rab by King & Spalding on 5/15/2012 In a landmark decision on 4 April 2012, Pakistan’s Competition Commission (CCP) granted Siemens total immunity from fines for its cooperation in a cartel investigation relating to bid rigging in supplies to power companies....more
FTC Rejects Limits on Affirmative Recovery under Holder Rule by Ballard Spahr LLP on 5/15/2012 The Federal Trade Commission has declared that a consumer’s right to an affirmative recovery under the Holder Rule is not limited to circumstances where the consumer can legally rescind the transaction or had purchased...more
Resale Pricing Policies Withstand State Scrutiny Again, but Suppliers Should Continue to Exercise Caution by McDermott Will & Emery on 5/14/2012 A recent New York state appeals court decision highlights the need for suppliers to continue exercising caution when adopting and implementing a resale price maintenance policy. On March 29, 2010, the New York Office of...more
Resale Pricing Policies Withstand State Scrutiny Again, but Suppliers Should Continue to Exercise Caution by McDermott Will & Emery on 5/14/2012 A recent New York state appeals court decision highlights the need for suppliers to continue exercising caution when adopting and implementing a resale price maintenance policy. On March 29, 2010, the New York Office of...more
Kansas Supreme Court Decision Declares Resale Price Maintenance Per Se Illegal Under State Antitrust Statute by McDermott Will & Emery on 5/14/2012 The Kansas Supreme Court recently determined resale price maintenance is per se illegal under state law, becoming the latest state to reject the rule of reason standard mandated by the Supreme Court of the United States. The...more
REGULATORY: Global Competition Law: India Coal Complaint Sets Off Explosive Fine by Suzanne Rab by King & Spalding on 5/14/2012 The Competition Commission of India (CCI), India’s antitrust watchdog, has fined ten explosives companies a total of 600 million rupees (approximately USD 11.5 million/ EUR 8.7 million) for rigging bids put out by Coal India...more