News & Analysis as of

Civil Procedure Products Liability

Read Civil Procedure updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:

The Class Action Chronicle Fall 2017

This edition focuses on rulings issued between May 15, 2017, and August 15, 2017. In this issue, we cover four decisions granting motions to strike/dismiss class claims, five decisions denying such motions, 27 decisions...more

MDL Direct Filing & Personal Jurisdiction

by Reed Smith on

Bexis gave a talk the other day at the Washington Legal Foundation on personal jurisdiction after last term’s United States Supreme Court decisions in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017)...more

Double Preemption Win in Amiodarone Litigation

by Reed Smith on

With PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, 564 U.S. 604 (2011), and Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, 133 S. Ct. 2466 (2013), preemption arguments in cases involving generic prescription drugs has become a little like shooting fish in...more

Illinois Supreme Court Issues Opinion that May Change Asbestos Litigation Landscape

by Steptoe & Johnson PLLC on

On September 21, 2017 the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois issued a personal jurisdiction opinion that may change the national landscape of asbestos litigation. Aspen American Insurance Company v. Interstate...more

Empty Gestures – Pennsylvania’s Right To Try Legislation

by Reed Smith on

For the second time in three years the Pennsylvania legislature has proven itself entirely unable to carry out its most basic function, which is to pass a budget – any budget – which is balanced and otherwise meets...more

The Bank Rejects Fosamax Folly

by Reed Smith on

Look what just fell into our lap. Our blogging about the favorable California Risperdal preemption decision last week shook loose from that same case a subsequent denial of reconsideration of a summary judgment motion in...more

Lucky Seven – Multi-Plaintiff Misjoinder Fails in Illinois Post-BMS

by Reed Smith on

Once the Supreme Court’s decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017), definitively determined that non-resident plaintiffs can’t go suing non-resident defendants anywhere they want,...more

The Third Circuit Fosamax Preemption Error Has Got To Go, Part 2

by Reed Smith on

We’ve come to expect top-flight work product from the Product Liability Advisory Council (PLAC), even when it isn’t Bexis pushing the pen or pecking at the keyboard (as he has done so many times on so many important issues)....more

Asking the Right Questions at the Expert’s Deposition to lay the foundation for your client’s Daubert Challenge (Part 1)

by Wilson Elser on

Deposing your adversary’s liability expert is not only a chance to delve into the details of the expert’s opinions, but the deposition also presents a great opportunity for defense counsel to explore the sustainability of the...more

Innovator Liability, Perpetual Liability Argued in California Supreme Court

by Reed Smith on

The California Supreme Court heard oral argument in T.H. v. Novartis on Monday. That is the case where the California Court of Appeal held that a prescription drug manufacturer could be held liable for injuries allegedly...more

Fraud on the FDA? If Not Preempted, It Is Trumpery

by Reed Smith on

With Bexis having originally conceived the preemption argument that became Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), we are always on the lookout for ways in which plaintiffs attempt to circumvent...more

Off-Label Marketing Case Tossed

by Reed Smith on

Implied Preemption. Off-label promotion. TwIqbal. They make up a core of our posts, yet we never seem to tire of them. Maybe our readers, especially interlopers from the other side of the v., tire of reading about them,...more

District Court Decides Flurry Of Discovery Motions In Dispute Between Reinsurer And Insurer Over Underlying Asbestos Claims

by Carlton Fields on

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently ruled on several discovery motions in a reinsurance dispute between R&Q Reinsurance Company (“R&Q”) and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) over underlying...more

The Ninth Circuit’s Food Court Menu: A Status Update

A few years back, the Northern District of California was dubbed the “food court” based on the influx of food misbranding class actions claiming that alleged FDA regulatory infractions constituted violations of California...more

N.Y. Court Holds that Manufacturer Cannot be Responsible for Medical Malpractice

by Reed Smith on

We harbor a suspicion that half the drug/device tort cases we encounter are really medical malpractice cases in search of a deeper pocket (thank you medmal damage cap statutes). We’ve said before that both Levine and Riegel...more

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Constitutional Limits on Specific Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants…Again

by Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

Since 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court has continued to roll back the expansion of personal jurisdiction by lower courts and has set more limitations on where a plaintiff can sue corporate defendants. We have watched this unfold...more

Products Liability? Prove It

by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on

Under South Carolina law, a products liability case may be founded in several theories, including warranty. Regardless of the chosen theory, however, a plaintiff must establish (1) he was injured by the product; (2) at the...more

No Causation, No “Parallel Claim”

by Reed Smith on

The district court’s order dismissing claims in Ebrahimi v. Mentor Worldwide LLC, No. CV 16-7316, 2017 WL 4128976 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2017), is a good antidote to the Ninth Circuit’s wrongly decided opinion in Stengel v....more

Sham Affidavits

by Reed Smith on

We’re quite familiar with people who say one thing, when they think that’s in their interest, and later when circumstances change, say something quite different. For example, as the late, great Molly Ivins pointed out in...more

Awful Missouri Venue and Warnings Opinion Affirmed—But Maybe Some Hope

by Reed Smith on

Hope springs eternal. At least that is what the optimists say, and while we would like to see the bright side of the Missouri Supreme Court’s split opinion on venue in Barron v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., No. SC 96151, 2017...more

FDA Weighs in on Off-Label Use and Preemption

by Reed Smith on

Back in 2013, Ramirez v. Medtronic Inc., 961 F. Supp.2d 977 (D. Ariz. 2013), made it to #9 on our worst cases of the year list – which is pretty good (actually, pretty bad) for a trial court decision. Purporting to apply...more

Aviations Happenings - Fall 2017

The Fall 2017 edition of Schnader’s Aviation Group newsletter examines some of the most recent and relevant cases and developments in aviation law, including: ·$2.8 Million Verdict Upheld Against Engine...more

When Plaintiff Conduct Matters

by Reed Smith on

We previously addressed the in pari delicto doctrine, whereby a plaintiff injured in the course of his or her criminal conduct cannot recover for those injuries. We specifically examined this doctrine’s most common...more

Medical Monitoring Class Certification Fails

by Reed Smith on

Normally, when we think of decisions relating to medical monitoring, the issue is whether a state will recognize medical monitoring for uninjured people as a separate claim or relief that can be sought under an existing...more

Lack of Substantiation Theories in False Advertising Cases—The Burden Lies on the Plaintiff

by Cozen O'Connor on

Often when we think of product liability we think of a product that doesn’t function as intended and causes some sort of damage resulting in warning, design and/or manufacturing defect claims. However, another important...more

1,731 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 70
Cybersecurity

Follow Civil Procedure Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.