News & Analysis as of

Anti-Competitive › Evidence › Burden of Proof

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Attempt to Monopolize Claim Fails Where Plaintiff Cannot Establish Approach to Monopoly Power in Properly Defined Relevant Market

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

Practitioners interested in the real world application of an attempt to monopolize claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, will find Savory Pie Guy a “good read” for the New Year. Savory Pie Guy, LLC v. Comtec Industries,...more

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC

Defending Commercial Class Actions: Recent Cases May be Giving the Defense an Edge

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on

While the ripples from the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes are still being felt, the Court may make further class action waves this term with its pending decision in Comcast v. Behrend. This...more

2 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide